Suggests that loss of treatment response is likely due to loss of placebo response

Providence, RI – A new study by Rhode Island Hospital researchers indicates that a relapse during antidepressant continuation treatment may be due to a relapse in patients who were not true drug responders. The loss of drug response may be due to loss of placebo response (a positive medical response to taking a placebo as if it were an active medication.). The study was published in the August issue of the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.

Historically, the treatment of depression is divided into three phases – initial/acute, continuation and maintenance. During the initial phase, the goal is to reduce symptoms and psychosocial impairment. During the continuation phase, usually six months to one year after initial treatment response, the goal is to maintain the gains and prevent a relapse. In the maintenance phase, which occurs after a sustained period of improvement, the goal is to further maintain the gains and prevent recurrence of the disorder.

Mark Zimmerman, MD, director of outpatient psychiatry at Rhode Island Hospital and associate professor of psychiatry and human behavior at the Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, is the paper’s lead author. Zimmerman, along with his colleague Tavi Thongy, MD, also of Rhode Island Hospital and Brown University, conducted a meta-analysis of continuation studies of new generation antidepressants that began as placebo-controlled acute phase studies. Treatment studies of depression have found that approximately 50 to 65 percent of patients respond to medication and that approximately 25 to 35 percent respond to placebo.

Past studies have indicated that a number of patients who respond to treatment in the initial phase experience a relapse or recurrence despite ongoing pharmacotherapy during the two latter phases of treatment. This return of symptoms is often interpreted as a loss of efficacy of antidepressant activity, and is referred to as tachyphylaxis or the “poop-out” effect. Zimmerman says, “When a patient improves after being prescribed an antidepressant medication you do not know if they got better because of the medication or because they had a placebo response.”

The researchers used formulas developed by Quitkin and colleagues more than a decade ago to calculate the relapse rate attributable to relapse in presumptive placebo responders. “Our study suggests that the return of symptoms despite ongoing treatment during the continuation and maintenance phases of treatment may not represent a loss of drug effect because the patient may not have experienced a true drug response in the first place.” Zimmerman also notes, “While our conclusion is limited to the continuation phase of treatment, our results suggest that these findings probably also apply to the maintenance phase of treatment.”

The researchers note that these findings are not inconsistent with conclusions that continuation and maintenance studies of antidepressants have clearly established the benefit of ongoing treatment beyond the acute phase.

Dollinger, S.J. (2007). Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1025-1035.

Abstract
Across a range of disciplines it is assumed that conservatism and creativity are polar opposites. Although conservatism correlates negatively with appreciation of certain art forms, are conservatives in fact less creative? Four hundred and twenty-two undergraduates completed a Creative Behavior Inventory and creative products judged by the consensual assessment technique. Compared to more liberal college students, those endorsing more conservative positions on a brief version of the Conservatism scale had fewer creative accomplishments and devised photo essays and drawings judged as less creative. Results for accomplishments and drawing products held true when controlling for verbal ability and openness.