<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:ent="http://www.purl.org/NET/ENT/1.0/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
  <title>Synapse</title>
  <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog</link>
  <description>Things of interest from psychology past and present.</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:41:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
  <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
  <generator>Blogware</generator>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Coughing and Other Respiratory Symptoms Improve Within Weeks of Smoking Cessation</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/2/4/4991835.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/2/4/4991835.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:17:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>If the proven long-term benefits of smoking cessation are not enough to motivate young adults to stop smoking, a new study shows that 18- to 24-year olds who stop smoking for at least two weeks report substantially fewer respiratory symptoms, especially coughing. The study findings are detailed in &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology&lt;/span&gt;, a peer-reviewed journal published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. The article is available online.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Karen Calabro, DrPH and Alexander Prokhorov, MD, PhD, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, compared self-reported respiratory symptoms among two groups of college students who participated in programs designed to motivate them to stop smoking. One group achieved smoking cessation for two weeks or longer and the other group failed to stop smoking. More than half of the students smoked 5-10 cigarettes a day and had smoked for 1-5 years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;That the benefit of stopping smoking starts in days to weeks–not years or decades–is important. Now health care providers can counsel young smokers that their breathing can feel better soon after they stop. This can help to motivate young adults to stop smoking before the severe damage is done,&quot; says Harold Farber, MD, MSPH, Editor of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology and Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Section of Pulmonology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/StressHealthandIllness">Stress, Health and Illness</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Lifelong Payoff for Attentive Kindergarten Kids</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/2/2/4990325.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/2/2/4990325.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:28:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>Research shows that good kindergarten attention skills predict later work-oriented behavior&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Attentiveness in kindergarten accurately predicts the development of &quot;work-oriented&quot; skills in school children, according to a new study published by Dr. Linda Pagani, a professor and researcher at the University of Montreal and CHU Sainte-Justine. Elementary school teachers made observations of attention skills in over a thousand kindergarten children. Then, from grades 1 to 6, homeroom teachers rated how well the children worked both autonomously and with fellow classmates, their levels of self-control and self-confidence, and their ability to follow directions and rules. &quot;For children, the classroom is the workplace, and this is why productive, task-oriented behavior in that context later translates to the labor market,&quot; Pagani said. &quot;Children who are more likely to work autonomously and harmoniously with fellow classmates, with good self-control and confidence, and who follow directions and rules are more likely to continue such productive behaviors into the adult workplace. In child psychology, we call this the developmental evolution of work-oriented skills, from childhood to adulthood.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All the children attended kindergarten in the poorest neighborhoods of Montreal, and their teachers used a carefully constructed observational scale to score them on their attentiveness skills. Over time, the researchers identified the evolution of three groups of children: those with high, medium, and low classroom engagement. All analyses were reviewed to take into account various explanations for the link that was observed between kindergarten attention and classroom engagement. &quot;Teachers spend many hours per day in school-related activities and can therefore reliably report on them,&quot; Pagani explained. The researchers found that boys, aggressive children, and children with lower cognitive skills in kindergarten were much more likely to belong to the low trajectory.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;There are important life risks associated with attention deficits in childhood, which include high-school dropout, unemployment, and problematic substance abuse. Pagani said. &quot;Our findings make a compelling case for early identification and treatment of attention problems, as early remediation represents the least costly form of intervention. Universal approaches to bolstering attention skills in kindergarten might translate into stable and productive pathways toward learning.&quot; The researchers noted that the next step would be to undertake further study into how specifically the classroom environment influences children&#39;s attention spans.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/CognitivePsych">Cognitive Psych</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/LifespanDevelopment">Lifespan Development</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>In Times of Scandal, Corporations are Likely to Use Others&#39; Misconduct to Justify Their Behavior</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/2/2/4990328.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/2/2/4990328.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:33:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>Among corporations involved in the 2006 stock-option backdating scandal, those implicated earlier were more likely to dismiss their top executives than those that surfaced later on, according to new research from Rice University and the University of California at Irvine. The study, &quot;Executive Turnover in the Stock-Option Backdating Wave: The Impact of Social Context,&quot; will be published in an upcoming edition of the &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Strategic Management Journal&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The researchers examined the behavior of corporate boards following the 2006 stock-option backdating scandal, in which firms illegally manipulated stock-option grant dates. Researchers reviewed the 141 companies listed as having come under scrutiny for their stock-option practices in the Wall Street Journal Options Scorecard website to understand why corporations respond to the same kind of misconduct in different ways. &quot;When faced with scandal, it&#39;s critical for corporations to manage their images and maintain legitimacy with stakeholders and the general public,&quot; said Anthea Zhang, professor of strategic management at Rice University&#39;s Jones Graduate School of Business. &quot;While it seems to be a natural choice to fire the executives/directors who should be responsible for option backdating, only one-third of the 141 firms we surveyed elected to do so.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Zhang and her co-author, Margarethe Wiersema at the University of California at Irvine, theorize that the decrease in executive/director turnover over the course of the scandal can be attributed to companies using other companies&#39; similar misconduct to justify their own misconduct. &quot;Our findings suggest that corporate boards &#39;strategize&#39; their response by calculating the reputation damage caused by scandal,&quot; Zhang said. &quot;If accountability were the basis for their decision-making, we should have observed a more consistent pattern of companies choosing to dismiss their executives/directors over time.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Zhang said that attention from the media, as well as investigation by the Department of Justice and/or the Securities and Exchange Commission, plays an important role in pushing companies involved in the scandal to fire their executives and directors. &quot;This attention serves to counterbalance corporation boards&#39; tendency to justify their misbehavior with others&#39; misbehavior,&quot; she said. Zhang hopes their research can help stakeholders and the general public better understand how corporate boards respond to scandal.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/SocialPsychSocialIssues">Social Psych/Social Issues</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Societal Control of Sugar Essential to Ease Public Health Burden</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/2/2/4990331.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/2/2/4990331.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:18:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>Sugar should be controlled like alcohol and tobacco to protect public health, according to a team of UCSF researchers, who maintain in a new report that sugar is fueling a global obesity pandemic, contributing to 35 million deaths annually worldwide from non-communicable diseases like diabetes, heart disease and cancer. Non-communicable diseases now pose a greater health burden worldwide than infectious diseases, according to the United Nations. In the United States, 75 percent of health care dollars are spent treating these diseases and their associated disabilities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the Feb. 2 issue of &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Nature&lt;/span&gt;, Robert Lustig MD, Laura Schmidt PhD, MSW, MPH, and Claire Brindis, DPH, colleagues at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), argue that sugar&#39;s potential for abuse, coupled with its toxicity and pervasiveness in the Western diet make it a primary culprit of this worldwide health crisis. This partnership of scientists trained in endocrinology, sociology and public health took a new look at the accumulating scientific evidence on sugar. Such interdisciplinary liaisons underscore the power of academic health sciences institutions like UCSF.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sugar, they argue, is far from just &quot;empty calories&quot; that make people fat. At the levels consumed by most Americans, sugar changes metabolism, raises blood pressure, critically alters the signaling of hormones and causes significant damage to the liver – the least understood of sugar&#39;s damages. These health hazards largely mirror the effects of drinking too much alcohol, which they point out in their commentary is the distillation of sugar.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Worldwide consumption of sugar has tripled during the past 50 years and is viewed as a key cause of the obesity epidemic. But obesity, Lustig, Schmidt and Brindis argue, may just be a marker for the damage caused by the toxic effects of too much sugar. This would help explain why 40 percent of people with metabolic syndrome—the key metabolic changes that lead to diabetes, heart disease and cancer—are not clinically obese. &quot;As long as the public thinks that sugar is just &#39;empty calories,&#39; we have no chance in solving this,&quot; said Lustig, a professor of pediatrics, in the division of endocrinology at the UCSF Benioff Children&#39;s Hospital and director of the Weight Assessment for Teen and Child Health (WATCH) Program at UCSF. &quot;There are good calories and bad calories, just as there are good fats and bad fats, good amino acids and bad amino acids, good carbohydrates and bad carbohydrates,&quot; Lustig said. &quot;But sugar is toxic beyond its calories.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Limiting the consumption of sugar has challenges beyond educating people about its potential toxicity. &quot;We recognize that there are cultural and celebratory aspects of sugar,&quot; said Brindis, director of UCSF&#39;s Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies. &quot;Changing these patterns is very complicated.&quot; According to Brindis, effective interventions can&#39;t rely solely on individual change, but instead on environmental and community-wide solutions, similar to what has occurred with alcohol and tobacco, that increase the likelihood of success. The authors argue for society to shift away from high sugar consumption, the public must be better informed about the emerging science on sugar. &quot;There is an enormous gap between what we know from science and what we practice in reality,&quot; said Schmidt, professor of health policy at UCSF&#39;s Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies (IHPS) and co-chair of UCSF&#39;s Clinical and Translational Science Institute&#39;s (CTSI) Community Engagement and Health Policy Program, which focuses on alcohol and addiction research. &quot;In order to move the health needle, this issue needs to be recognized as a fundamental concern at the global level,&quot; she said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The paper was made possible with funding from UCSF&#39;s Clinical and Translational Science Institute, UCSF&#39;s National Institutes of Health-funded program that helps accelerate clinical and translational research through interdisciplinary, interprofessional and transdisciplinary work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many of the interventions that have reduced alcohol and tobacco consumption can be models for addressing the sugar problem, such as levying special sales taxes, controlling access, and tightening licensing requirements on vending machines and snack bars that sell high sugar products in schools and workplaces. &quot;We&#39;re not talking prohibition,&quot; Schmidt said. &quot;We&#39;re not advocating a major imposition of the government into people&#39;s lives. We&#39;re talking about gentle ways to make sugar consumption slightly less convenient, thereby moving people away from the concentrated dose. What we want is to actually increase people&#39;s choices by making foods that aren&#39;t loaded with sugar comparatively easier and cheaper to get.&quot;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/StressHealthandIllness">Stress, Health and Illness</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Tiny Crooners: Male House Mice Sing Songs to Impress the Girls</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/27/4986957.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/27/4986957.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:08:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>It has been known for some time that house mice (&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Mus musculus&lt;/span&gt;) produce ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) during courtship but it has generally been assumed that these are no more than squeaks. However, recent spectrographic analyses have revealed that USVs are complex and show features of song. Although the vocalizations are inaudible to human ears, when playbacks of recorded songs are slowed down their similarity to bird song becomes striking. Frauke Hoffmann, Kerstin Musolf and Dustin Penn of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna&#39;s Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology aimed to learn what type of information is contained in males&#39; songs for the discerning ear of the female mouse to detect. Their initial studies, the first to study song in wild mice, confirmed that males emit songs when they encounter a females&#39; scent and that females are attracted to males&#39; songs. Additionally, the scientists discovered that females are able to distinguish siblings from unrelated males by their songs – even though they had previously never heard their brothers sing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In their recent studies, Penn&#39;s group recorded and analysed the courtship calls of wild-caught male house mice for the first time, using digital audio software to examine parameters such as duration, pitch and frequency. They found that males&#39; songs contain &quot;signatures&quot; or &quot;fingerprints&quot; that differ from one individual to another. Moreover, they confirmed that the songs of siblings are very similar to one another compared to the songs of unrelated males, which helps explains how females can distinguish unrelated males. This finding could potentially lead us to understand how female mice avoid inbreeding.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interestingly, in some species of birds the males with the most complex songs appear to be most successful at attracting females. Further studies are needed to determine whether the complexity of male mouse vocalizations has an effect on females that is similar to that of &quot;sexy syllables&quot; in birds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The vocalizations of wild house mice differ significantly from those of inbred strains of laboratory mice. Wild male mice produce more syllables within high frequency ranges than laboratory mice, a result that is consistent with other studies that find genetic effects on mouse song. &quot;It seems as though house mice might provide a new model organism for the study of song in animals,&quot; says Dustin Penn. &quot;Who would have thought that?&quot;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Ethology">Ethology</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Believing the Impossible and Conspiracy Theories</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/27/4986956.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/27/4986956.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:46:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>Distrust and paranoia about government has a long history, and the feeling that there is a conspiracy of elites can lead to suspicion for authorities and the claims they make. For some, the attraction of conspiracy theories is so strong that it leads them to endorse entirely contradictory beliefs, according to a study in the current &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Social Psychological and Personality Science&lt;/span&gt; (published by SAGE). People who endorse conspiracy theories see authorities as fundamentally deceptive. The conviction that the &quot;official story&quot; is untrue can lead people to believe several alternative theories-despite contradictions among them. &quot;Any conspiracy theory that stands in opposition to the official narrative will gain some degree of endorsement from someone who holds a conspiracist worldview,&quot; according to Michael Wood, Karen Douglas and Robbie Sutton of the University of Kent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To see if conspiracy views were strong enough to lead to inconsistencies, the researchers asked 137 college students about the death of Princess Diana. The more people thought there &quot;was an official campaign by the intelligence service to assassinate Diana,&quot; the more they also believed that &quot;Diana faked her own death to retreat into isolation.&quot; Of course, Diana cannot be simultaneously dead and alive. The researchers wanted to know if the contradictory beliefs were due to suspicion of authorities, so they asked 102 college students about the death of Osama bin Laden (OBL). People who believed that &quot;when the raid took place, OBL was already dead,&quot; were significantly more likely to also believe that &quot;OBL is still alive.&quot; Since bin Laden is not Schrödinger&#39;s cat, he must either be alive or dead. The researchers found that the belief that the &quot;actions of the Obama administration indicate that they are hiding some important or damaging piece of information about the raid&quot; was responsible for the connection between the two conspiracy theories. Conspiracy belief is so potent that it will lead to belief in completely inconsistent ideas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;For conspiracy theorists, those in power are seen as deceptive-even malevolent-and so any official explanation is at a disadvantage, and any alternative explanation is more credible from the start,&quot; said the authors. It is no surprise that fear, mistrust, and even paranoia can lead to muddled thinking; when distrust is engaged, careful reasoning can coast on by. &quot;Believing Osama is still alive,&quot; they write, &#39;is no obstacle to believing that he has been dead for years.&quot;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/PsychDisorders">Psych Disorders</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Being Ignored Hurts, Even By a Stranger</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/26/4986309.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/26/4986309.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:30:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>Feeling like you&#39;re part of the gang is crucial to the human experience. All people get stressed out when we&#39;re left out. A new study published in &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Psychological Science&lt;/span&gt;, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, finds that a feeling of inclusion can come from something as simple as eye contact from a stranger.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Psychologists already know that humans have to feel connected to each other to be happy. A knitting circle, a church choir, or a friendly neighbor can all feed that need for connection. Eric D. Wesselmann of Purdue University wanted to know just how small a cue could help someone feel connected. He cowrote the study with Florencia D. Cardoso of the Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata in Argentina, Samantha Slater of Ohio University, and Kipling D. Williams of Purdue. &quot;Some of my coauthors have found, for example, that people have reported that they felt bothered sometimes even when a stranger hasn&#39;t acknowledged them,&quot; Wesselmann says. He and his authors came up with an experiment to test that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The study was carried out with the cooperation of people on campus at Purdue University. A research assistant walked along a well-populated path, picked a subject, and either met that person&#39;s eyes, met their eyes and smiled, or looked in the direction of the person&#39;s eyes, but past them—past an ear, for example, &quot;looking at them as if they were air,&quot; Wesselmann says. When the assistant had passed the person, he or she gave a thumbs-up behind the back to indicate that another experimenter should stop that person. The second experimenter asked, &quot;Within the last minute, how disconnected do you feel from others?&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People who had gotten eye contact from the research assistant, with or without a smile, felt less disconnected than people who had been looked at as if they weren&#39;t there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;These are people that you don&#39;t know, just walking by you, but them looking at you or giving you the air gaze—looking through you—seemed to have at least momentary effect,&quot; Wesselmann says. Other research has found that even being ostracized by a group you want nothing to do with, like the Ku Klux Klan, can make people feel left out, so it&#39;s not surprising that being pointedly ignored can have the same effect. &quot;What we find so interesting about this is that now we can further speak to the power of human social connection,&quot; Wesselmann says. &quot;It seems to be a very strong phenomenon.&quot;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/SocialPsychSocialIssues">Social Psych/Social Issues</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Expensive Egos</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/25/4985675.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/25/4985675.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:32:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Narcissism has a higher health cost for men&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The personality trait narcissism may have an especially negative effect on the health of men, according to a recent study published in &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;PLoS ONE&lt;/span&gt;. &quot;Narcissistic men may be paying a high price in terms of their physical health, in addition to the psychological cost to their relationships,&quot; says Sara Konrath, a University of Michigan psychologist who co-authored the study. Earlier studies by Konrath and others have shown that the level of narcissism is rising in American culture, and that narcissism tends to be more prevalent among males. The personality trait is characterized by an inflated sense of self-importance, overestimations of uniqueness, and a sense of grandiosity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the new study, Konrath and colleagues David Reinhard of the University of Virginia, and William Lopez and Heather Cameron of the University of Michigan examined the role of narcissism and sex on cortisol levels in a sample of 106 undergraduate students. Cortisol, which can be measured through saliva samples, is a widely used marker of physiological stress. The researchers measured cortisol levels at two points in time in order to assess baseline levels of the hormone, which signals the level of activation of the body&#39;s key stress response system, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Participants were not asked to complete any tasks that would elevate their stress. Elevated levels of cortisol in a relatively stress-free situation would indicate chronic HPA activation, which has significant health implications, increasing the risk of cardiovascular problems.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To assess participants&#39; narcissism, the researchers administered a 40-item narcissism questionnaire that measures five different components of the personality trait. Two of these components are more maladaptive, or unhealthy – exploitativeness and entitlement; and the other three are more adaptive, or healthy – leadership/authority, superiority/arrogance, and self-absorption/self-admiration. &quot;Even though narcissists have grandiose self-perceptions, they also have fragile views of themselves, and often resort to defensive strategies like aggression when their sense of superiority is threatened,&quot; says Reinhard. &quot;These kinds of coping strategies are linked with increased cardiovascular reactivity to stress and higher blood pressure, so it makes sense that higher levels of maladaptive narcissism would contribute to highly reactive stress response systems and chronically elevated levels of stress.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Reinhard, Konrath and colleagues found that the most toxic aspects of narcissism were indeed associated with higher cortisol in male participants, but not in females. In fact, unhealthy narcissism was more than twice as large a predictor of cortisol in males as in females. They also found that there was no relationship between healthy narcissism and cortisol in either males or females. &quot;These findings extend previous research by showing that narcissism may not only influence how people respond to stressful events, but may also affect how they respond to their regular day-to-day routines and interactions,&quot; says Konrath. &quot;Our findings suggest that the HPA axis may be chronically activated in males high in unhealthy narcissism, even without an explicit stressor.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why should narcissism affect males differently? &quot;Given societal definitions of masculinity that overlap with narcissism – for example, the belief that men should be arrogant and dominant – men who endorse stereotypically male sex roles and who are also high in narcissism may feel especially stressed,&quot; Konrath suggests.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In future research, she hopes to examine why narcissism is not as physiologically taxing for women as it is for men, and also to examine the potential links between maladaptive narcissism and other physiological responses related to stress and poor coping, including inflammatory markers such as C-Reactive Protein. &lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Personality">Personality</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>CU School of Medicine Researchers Look at Effects of 2 Common Sweeteners on the Body</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/25/4985673.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/25/4985673.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:29:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>With growing concern that excessive levels of fructose may pose a great health risk – causing high blood pressure, kidney disease and diabetes – researchers at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, along with their colleagues at the University of Florida, set out to see if two common sweeteners in western diets differ in their effects on the body in the first few hours after ingestion. The study, recently published in the journal &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Metabolism&lt;/span&gt;, took a closer look at high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and table sugar (sucrose) and was led by Dr MyPhuong Le (now a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Colorado) and Dr Julie Johnson, a Professor of Pharmacogenomics at the University of Florida.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Both HFCS and sucrose have historically been considered to have nearly identical effects on the body. But this study finds that indeed there is a difference between the two. They found that the makeup of the sugars resulted in differences in how much fructose was absorbed into the circulation, and which could have potential impact on one&#39;s health. Sucrose is 50 percent fructose and 50 percent glucose that is bonded together as a disaccharide (complex carbohydrate) and HFCS is a mixture of free fructose (55%) and free glucose (45%). It&#39;s the difference in fructose amount that appears to create the ill health effects on the body.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Their study was conducted at the University of Florida, where they evaluated 40 men and women who were given 24 ounces of HFCS- or sugar-sweetened soft drinks. Careful measurements showed that the HFCS sweetened soft drinks resulted in significantly higher fructose levels than the sugar-sweetened drinks. Fructose is also known to increase uric acid levels that have been implicated in blood pressure, and the HFCS-sweetened drinks also resulted in a higher uric acid level and a 3 mm Hg greater rise in systolic blood pressure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dr Richard Johnson, a coauthor in the study and Chief of the Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension at the University of Colorado, commented &quot;Although both sweeteners are often considered the same in terms of their biological effects, this study demonstrates that there are subtle differences. Soft drinks containing HFCS result in slightly higher blood levels of fructose than sucrose-sweetened drinks, &quot;said Johnson. &quot;The next step is for new studies to address whether the long-term effects of these two sweeteners are different.&quot;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/StressHealthandIllness">Stress, Health and Illness</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Bonobos&#39; Unusual Success Story</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/25/4985663.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/25/4985663.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:11:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Max Planck researchers reveal the structure of the cellular protein degradation machinery&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mate competition by males over females is common in many animal species. During mating season male testosterone levels rise, resulting in an increase in aggressive behavior and masculine features. Male bonobos, however, invest much more into friendly relationships with females. Elevated testosterone and aggression levels would collide with this increased tendency towards forming pair-relationships.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bonobos are among the closest living relatives of humans. Like other great apes they live in groups made up of several males and females. Contrary to other ape species however, male bonobos do not, in general, outrank female individuals and do not dominate them in mating contexts. This constellation suggests that the selection for typically masculine behavioral patterns like aggression, dominance and intrasexual competition are met with antagonistic forces: On one hand it is advantageous if a male outcompetes a fellow male. This, however, implies that there is increased aggression and an elevated level of testosterone in high-ranking males. On the other hand – as dominance relations between the sexes are rather balanced in bonobos – it is likely that males benefit from having friendly pair-relationships with female individuals. Studies with birds and rodents show that a tendency towards forming pair-relationships correlates with lower male aggression rates and testosterone levels.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In a current study, Martin Surbeck, Gottfried Hohmann, Tobias Deschner and colleagues of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eva.mpg.de/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology&lt;/a&gt; in Leipzig, Germany, found that in wild bonobos high-ranking males were more aggressive and their mating success was higher when compared to lower-ranking males. Contrary to other species in which males compete fiercely over access to females, there was no correlation between dominance status or aggression with testosterone levels. In addition, the researchers found that high-ranking males invested more often than lower-ranking group members into friendly relationships with females. This suggests that these friendly relationships between the sexes are associated with lower male testosterone levels.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Our study suggests that in bonobos – as in in humans – intersexual friendships result in hormonal patterns that we know from species in which male individuals are actively participating in raising their young and in which the two sexes enter lasting pair-relationships&quot;, says Martin Surbeck. &lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Ethology">Ethology</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Monogamy Reduces Major Social Problems of Polygamist Cultures</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/25/4985670.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/25/4985670.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:04:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>In cultures that permit men to take multiple wives, the intra-sexual competition that occurs causes greater levels of crime, violence, poverty and gender inequality than in societies that institutionalize and practice monogamous marriage. That is a key finding of a new University of British Columbia-led study that explores the global rise of monogamous marriage as a dominant cultural institution. The study suggests that institutionalized monogamous marriage is rapidly replacing polygamy because it has lower levels of inherent social problems. &quot;Our goal was to understand why monogamous marriage has become standard in most developed nations in recent centuries, when most recorded cultures have practiced polygyny,&quot; says UBC Prof. Joseph Henrich, a cultural anthropologist, referring to the form of polygamy that permits multiple wives, which continues to be practiced in some parts of Africa, Asia, the Middle East and North America. &quot;The emergence of monogamous marriage is also puzzling for some as the very people who most benefit from polygyny – wealthy, powerful men – were best positioned to reject it,&quot; says Henrich, lead author of the study that is published today in the journal &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society&lt;/span&gt;. &quot;Our findings suggest that that institutionalized monogamous marriage provides greater net benefits for society at large by reducing social problems that are inherent in polygynous societies.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Considered the most comprehensive study of polygamy and the institution of marriage, the study finds significantly higher levels rape, kidnapping, murder, assault, robbery and fraud in polygynous cultures. According to Henrich and his research team, which included Profs. Robert Boyd (UCLA) and Peter Richerson (UC Davis), these crimes are caused primarily by pools of unmarried men, which result when other men take multiple wives. &quot;The scarcity of marriageable women in polygamous cultures increases competition among men for the remaining unmarried women,&quot; says Henrich, adding that polygamy was outlawed in 1963 in Nepal, 1955 in India (partially), 1953 in China and 1880 in Japan. The greater competition increases the likelihood men in polygamous communities will resort to criminal behavior to gain resources and women, he says.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to Henrich, monogamy&#39;s main cultural evolutionary advantage over polygyny is the more egalitarian distribution of women, which reduces male competition and social problems. By shifting male efforts from seeking wives to paternal investment, institutionalized monogamy increases long-term planning, economic productivity, savings and child investment, the study finds. Monogamy&#39;s institutionalization has been assisted by its incorporation by religions, such as Christianity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Monogamous marriage also results in significant improvements in child welfare, including lower rates of child neglect, abuse, accidental death, homicide and intra-household conflict, the study finds. These benefits result from greater levels of parental investment, smaller households and increased direct &quot;blood relatedness&quot; in monogamous family households, says Henrich, who served as an expert witness for British Columbia&#39;s Supreme Court case involving the polygamous community of Bountiful, B.C.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Monogamous marriage has largely preceded democracy and voting rights for women in the nations where it has been institutionalized, says Henrich, the Canadian Research Chair in Culture, Cognition and Evolution in UBC&#39;s Depts. of Psychology and Economics. By decreasing competition for younger and younger brides, monogamous marriage increases the age of first marriage for females, decreases the spousal age gap and elevates female influence in household decisions which decreases total fertility and increases gender equality. &lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/SocialPsychSocialIssues">Social Psych/Social Issues</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Magic Mushrooms&#39; Effects Illuminated in Brain Imaging Studies</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/25/4985666.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/25/4985666.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:58:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>Brain scans of people under the influence of the psilocybin, the active ingredient in magic mushrooms, have given scientists the most detailed picture to date of how psychedelic drugs work. The findings of two studies being published in scientific journals this week identify areas of the brain where activity is suppressed by psilocybin and suggest that it helps people to experience memories more vividly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the first study, published today in &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences&lt;/span&gt; (PNAS), 30 healthy volunteers had psilocybin infused into their blood while inside magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners, which measure changes in brain activity. The scans showed that activity decreased in &quot;hub&quot; regions of the brain – areas that are especially well-connected with other areas. The second study, due to be published online by the &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;British Journal of Psychiatry&lt;/span&gt; on Thursday, found that psilocybin enhanced volunteers&#39; recollections of personal memories, which the researchers suggest could make it useful as an adjunct to psychotherapy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Professor David Nutt, from the Department of Medicine at Imperial College London, the senior author of both studies, said: &quot;Psychedelics are thought of as &#39;mind-expanding&#39; drugs so it has commonly been assumed that they work by increasing brain activity, but surprisingly, we found that psilocybin actually caused activity to decrease in areas that have the densest connections with other areas. These hubs constrain our experience of the world and keep it orderly. We now know that deactivating these regions leads to a state in which the world is experienced as strange.&quot; The intensity of the effects reported by the participants, including visions of geometric patterns, unusual bodily sensations and altered sense of space and time, correlated with a decrease in oxygenation and blood flow in certain parts of the brain.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The function of these areas, the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), is the subject of debate among neuroscientists, but the PCC is proposed to have a role in consciousness and self-identity. The mPFC is known to be hyperactive in depression, so psilocybin&#39;s action on this area could be responsible for some antidepressant effects that have been reported. Similarly, psilocybin reduced blood flow in the hypothalamus, where blood flow is increased during cluster headaches, perhaps explaining why some sufferers have said symptoms improved under psilocybin.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;British Journal of Psychiatry&lt;/span&gt; study 10 volunteers viewed written cues that prompted them to think about memories associated with strong positive emotions while inside the brain scanner. The participants rated their recollections as being more vivid after taking psilocybin compared with a placebo, and with psilocybin there was increased activity in areas of the brain that process vision and other sensory information.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Participants were also asked to rate changes in their emotional well-being two weeks after taking the psilocybin and placebo. Their ratings of memory vividness under the drug showed a significant positive correlation with their well-being two weeks afterwards. In a previous study of 12 people in 2011, researchers found that people with anxiety who were given a single psilocybin treatment had decreased depression scores six months later. Dr Robin Carhart-Harris, from the Department of Medicine at Imperial College London, the first author of both papers, said: &quot;Psilocybin was used extensively in psychotherapy in the 1950s, but the biological rationale for its use has not been properly investigated until now. Our findings support the idea that psilocybin facilitates access to personal memories and emotions. &quot;Previous studies have suggested that psilocybin can improve people&#39;s sense of emotional well-being and even reduce depression in people with anxiety. This is consistent with our finding that psilocybin decreases mPFC activity, as many effective depression treatments do. The effects need to be investigated further, and ours was only a small study, but we are interested in exploring psilocybin&#39;s potential as a therapeutic tool.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The researchers acknowledged that because the participants in this study had volunteered after having previous experience of psychedelics, they may have held prior assumptions about the drugs which could have contributed to the positive memory rating and the reports of improved well-being in the follow-up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Functional MRI measures brain activity indirectly by mapping blood flow or the oxygen levels in the blood. When an area becomes more active, it uses more glucose, but generates energy in rapid chemical reactions that do not use oxygen. Consequently, blood flow increases but oxygen consumption does not, resulting in a higher concentration of oxygen in blood in the local veins.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the PNAS study, the volunteers were split into two groups, each studied using a different type of fMRI: 15 were scanned using arterial spin labelling (ASL) perfusion fMRI, which measures blood flow, and 15 using blood-oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI. The two modalities produced similar results, strongly suggesting that the observed effects were genuine.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/AlcoholandOtherDrugs">Alcohol and Other Drugs</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Marijuana Smoke Not as Damaging to Lungs as Cigarette Smoke</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/11/4976752.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/11/4976752.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:52:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>Using marijuana carries legal risks, but a new study shows that the consequences of occasionally lighting up do not include long-term loss of lung function, according to a new study by University of Alabama at Birmingham researchers published in the January 11, 2012, issue of the &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Journal of the American Medical Association&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Marijuana is the most commonly used illicit drug in the United States, according to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. In 2009, 16.7 million Americans ages 12 and older reported using marijuana at least once in the month prior to being surveyed. In addition, since 1996, 16 states and Washington, D.C., have legalized the medical use of marijuana to help manage the symptoms of many diseases, including cancer, AIDS and glaucoma. &quot;With marijuana use increasing and large numbers of people who have been and continue to be exposed, knowing whether it causes lasting damage to lung function is important for public-health messaging and medical use of marijuana,&quot; says the study&#39;s senior author, Stefan Kertesz, M.D., associate professor in the UAB Division of Preventive Medicine and with the Center for Surgical, Medical and Acute Care Research and Transitions at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Birmingham. Kertesz says it&#39;s long been known that marijuana smoke has many irritant chemicals found in tobacco smoke and can cause lung irritation, wheezing and cough immediately after use; however, the research on long-term effects on lung function have inconsistencies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Using a large national database, the research team compared the lung function of marijuana and tobacco smokers during a 20-year period. The data revealed that tobacco smoke had exactly the effect shown in all prior studies — increasing a person&#39;s cumulative exposure to cigarettes results in loss of air flow and lung volumes; the opposite was true for marijuana smoke. &quot;At levels of marijuana exposure commonly seen in Americans, occasional marijuana use was associated with increases in lung air flow rates and increases in lung capacity,&quot; Kertesz says. &quot;Those increases were not large, but they were statistically significant. And the data showed that even up to moderately high-use levels — one joint a day for seven years — there is no evidence of decreased air-flow rates or lung volumes.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kertesz cautions that smoking marijuana is not an avenue to better lung health. &quot;It&#39;s not enough of an increase that would make you feel better,&quot; he says &quot;Healthy adults can blow out 3 to 4 liters of air in one second. The amount of gain, on average, from marijuana is small, 50 ccs or roughly a fifth of a can of coke. So it&#39;s not something that would be noticeable.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, Kertesz says, the increase does not hold steadfast over time. &quot;The relationship changes for people who get to high levels of lifetime exposure,&quot; he says. &quot;At that point, the data suggests there is a decline in lung air-flow rate. There also may be other damaging effects that don&#39;t manifest until extremely high levels of exposure; we did not have enough very heavy marijuana smokers in this study to determine this.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To perform their analysis, Kertesz and a research team from other universities looked at data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study. CARDIA, funded by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, is a long-term research project involving more than 5,000 black and white men and women from Birmingham, Chicago, Minneapolis and Oakland, designed to examine the development and determinants of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors. Participants were recruited when they were ages 18-30 and followed from 1985 to 2006. The researchers looked closely at the reported use of both marijuana and tobacco and asked participants repeatedly during years of follow-up about their use of these substances. Marijuana and tobacco use were both commonly reported — 37 percent said they used marijuana at some point during the study. This is similar, the researchers say, to what many Americans have said in other national surveys.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As part of the CARDIA protocol, participants&#39; lung function was measured for air flow and lung volume at years 0, 2, 5, 10 and 20 using standard pulmonary function tests. The air flow measure is the amount of air you can blow out of your lungs in one second after taking the deepest breath possible. The volume measure is the total amount of air you can blow out after taking the deepest breath possible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lead author, Mark J. Pletcher, M.D., of the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, who led the statistical analysis, says what sets this study apart from any others is both the number of participants and duration of the study. &quot;This is not the first study to show that marijuana has a complicated relationship with lung function. However, the size of the study and the long duration of follow-up help us to paint a clearer picture of the ways in which the relationship changes over time,&quot; he says.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a final note, Kertesz clarified that the study did not examine other ways in which smoking marijuana could affect a person&#39;s health and insisted this study does not advocate the use of marijuana. &quot;Marijuana is still an illegal drug, and it has many complicated effects on the human body and its function,&quot; he says. &quot;In our findings we see hints of harm in pulmonary function with heavy use, and other studies have shown that marijuana use increases a user&#39;s likelihood of a heart attack, according to the American Heart Association, and impairs the immune system&#39;s ability to fight disease, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse.&quot; &lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/AlcoholandOtherDrugs">Alcohol and Other Drugs</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Cognitive Decline Sets in around Age 45</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/10/4975709.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/10/4975709.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:15:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>A new study finds that the inevitable cognitive decline we all face starts earlier than we originally thought. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=cognitive-decline-sets-in-around-ag-12-01-08&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Christie Nicholson reports&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/LifespanDevelopment">Lifespan Development</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Memory">Memory</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Nicotine Replacement Therapies May Not Be Effective in Helping People Quit Smoking</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/10/4975719.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/10/4975719.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:32:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>Nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs) designed to help people stop smoking, specifically nicotine patches and nicotine gum, do not appear to be effective in helping smokers quit long-term, even when combined with smoking cessation counseling, according to a new study by researchers at Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) and the University of Massachusetts Boston. The study appears January 9, 2012 in an advance online edition of &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Tobacco Control&lt;/span&gt; and will appear in a later print issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;What this study shows is the need for the Food and Drug Administration, which oversees regulation of both medications to help smokers quit and tobacco products, to approve only medications that have been proven to be effective in helping smokers quit in the long-term and to lower nicotine in order to reduce the addictiveness of cigarettes,&quot; said co-author Gregory Connolly, director of the Center for Global Tobacco Control at HSPH.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the prospective cohort study the researchers, including lead author Hillel Alpert, research scientist at HSPH, and co-author Lois Biener of the University of Massachusetts Boston&#39;s Center for Survey Research, followed 787 adult smokers in Massachusetts who had recently quit smoking. The participants were surveyed over three time periods: 2001-2002, 2003-2004, and 2005-2006. Participants were asked whether they had used a nicotine replacement therapy in the form of the nicotine patch (placed on the skin), nicotine gum, nicotine inhaler, or nasal spray to help them quit, and if so, what was the longest period of time they had used the product continuously. They also were asked if they had joined a quit-smoking program or received help from a doctor, counselor, or other professional.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The results showed that, for each time period, almost one-third of recent quitters reported to have relapsed. The researchers found no difference in relapse rate among those who used NRT for more than six weeks, with or without professional counseling. No difference in quitting success with use of NRT was found for either heavy or light smokers. &quot;This study shows that using NRT is no more effective in helping people stop smoking cigarettes in the long-term than trying to quit on one&#39;s own,&quot; Alpert said. He added that even though clinical trials (studies) have found NRT to be effective, &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;the new findings demonstrate the importance of empirical studies&lt;/span&gt; [emphasis added] regarding effectiveness when used in the general population.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Biener said that using public funds to provide NRT to the population at large is of questionable value, particularly when it reduces the amount of money available for smoking interventions shown in previous studies to be effective, such as media campaigns, promotion of no smoking policies, and tobacco price increases. Smoking cessation medications have been available over the counter since 1996, yet U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention statistics show that the previous adult smoking rate decline and quitting rates have stalled in the past five years.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/AlcoholandOtherDrugs">Alcohol and Other Drugs</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>How Many Lives Could a Soda Tax Save?</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/10/4975712.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/10/4975712.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:18:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;UCSF analysis suggests penny-per-ounce tax on sugary beverages would prevent heart disease, stroke and diabetes and save billions in healthcare costs&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Every year, Americans drink 13.8 billion gallons of soda, fruit punch, sweet tea, sports drinks, and other sweetened beverages—a mass consumption of sugar that is fueling soaring obesity and diabetes rates in the United States. Now a group of scientists at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center (SFGH) and Columbia University have analyzed the effect of a nationwide tax on these sugary drinks. They estimate slapping a penny-per-ounce tax on sweetened beverages would prevent nearly 100,000 cases of heart disease, 8,000 strokes, and 26,000 deaths every year. &quot;You would also prevent 240,000 cases of diabetes per year,&quot; said Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, an associate professor of medicine and of epidemiology and biostatistics at UCSF and acting director of the Center for Vulnerable Populations at SFGH.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In addition to $13 billion in direct tax revenue, Bibbins-Domingo and her colleagues estimated that such a tax would save the public $17 billion per year in healthcare-related expenses due to the decline of obesity-related diseases. &quot;Our hope is that these types of numbers are useful for policy makers to weigh decisions,&quot; she said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;The High Cost of High Calorie Drinks&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;Consumption of beverages high in calories but poor in nutritional value is the number one source of added sugar and excess calories in the American diet. Sugar- sweetened drinks are linked to type 2 diabetes and weight gain. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention listed reducing the intake of these beverages as one of its chief obesity prevention strategies in 2009, and several states and cities, including California and New York City, are already considering such taxes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The analysis by Bibbins-Domingo and her colleagues is among the first study to generate concrete estimates of the health benefits and cost savings of such a tax. They modeled these benefits by taking into account how many sodas and sugary beverages Americans drink every year and estimating how much less they would consume if a penny-per-ounce tax were imposed on these drinks. Economists have estimated that such a tax would reduce consumption by 10 to 15 percent over a decade. They then modeled how this reduction would play out in terms of reducing the burdens of diabetes, heart disease and their associated healthcare costs.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Tobacco Company Misrepresented Danger from Cigarettes</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/7/4974040.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/7/4974040.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 16:23:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>A new UCSF analysis of tobacco industry documents shows that Philip Morris USA manipulated data on the effects of additives in cigarettes, including menthol, obscuring actual toxicity levels and increasing the risk of heart, cancer and other diseases for smokers. Tobacco industry information can&#39;t be taken at face value, the researchers conclude. They say their work provides evidence that hundreds of additives, including menthol, should be eliminated from cigarettes on public health grounds. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001145&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; is published in &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;PLoS Medicine.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the new, independent study, the scientists reassessed data from Philip Morris&#39; &quot;Project MIX,&quot; which detailed chemical analyses of smoke and animal toxicology studies of 333 cigarette additives. Philip Morris, the nation&#39;s largest tobacco company, published its findings in 2002. By investigating the origins and design of Project MIX, the UCSF researchers conducted their own inquiry into the Philip Morris results. They stressed that many of the toxins in cigarette smoke substantially increased after additives were added to cigarettes. They also found, after obtaining evidence that additives increased toxicity, that tobacco scientists adjusted the protocol for presenting their results in a way that obscured these increases. &quot;We discovered these post-hoc changes in analytical protocols after the industry scientists found that the additives increased cigarette toxicity by increasing the number of fine particles in the cigarette smoke that cause heart and other diseases,&quot; said senior author Stanton A. Glantz, PhD, UCSF professor of medicine and director of the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at UCSF. &quot;When we conducted our own analysis by studying additives per cigarette – following Philip Morris&#39; original protocol -- we found that 15 carcinogenic chemicals increased by 20 percent or more,&quot; he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Additionally, in the independent study, the researchers discovered the reason behind Philip Morris&#39; failure to identify many toxic effects in animal studies: its studies were too small. &quot;The experiment was too small in terms of the number of rats analyzed to statistically detect important changes in biological effects,&quot; Glantz said. &quot;Philip Morris underpowered its own studies.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The results of &quot;Project MIX&quot; were first published as four papers in a 2002 edition of Food and Chemical Toxicology, a journal whose editor and many members of its editorial board had financial ties to the tobacco industry. While Philip Morris was trying to get the papers published, the company scientist who led Project Mix sent &lt;a href=&quot;http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/ekw86a00/pdf?search=%22inside%20job%20philip%20morris%20project%20mix%20email%22&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;an email&lt;/a&gt; (.pdf) to a colleague describing the peer review process as &quot;an inside job.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the new study, the researchers used documents made public as a result of litigation against the tobacco industry. The documents are available to the public through &lt;a href=&quot;http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;UCSF&#39;s Legacy Tobacco Documents Library&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/DepartmentofDuh">Department of Duh</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Dogs Read Our Intent</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/5/4972931.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/5/4972931.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:59:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>Dogs pick up not only on the words we say but also on our intent to communicate with them, according to a report published online in the Cell Press journal &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Current Biology&lt;/span&gt; on January 5. The findings might help to explain why so many people treat their furry friends like their children; dogs&#39; receptivity to human communication is surprisingly similar to the receptivity of very young children, the researchers say. &quot;Increasing evidence supports the notion that humans and dogs share some social skills, with dogs&#39; social-cognitive functioning resembling that of a 6-month to 2-year-old child in many respects,&quot; said József Topál of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. &quot;The utilization of ostensive cues is one of these features: dogs, as well as human infants, are sensitive to cues that signal communicative intent.&quot; Those cues include verbal addressing and eye contact, he explained. Whether or not dogs rely on similar pathways in the brain for processing those cues isn&#39;t yet clear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Topál&#39;s team presented dogs with video recordings of a person turning toward one of two identical plastic pots while an eye tracker captured information on the dogs&#39; reactions. In one condition, the person first looked straight at the dog, addressing it in a high-pitched voice with &quot;Hi dog!&quot; In the second condition, the person gave only a low-pitched &quot;Hi dog&quot; while avoiding eye contact.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The data show that the dogs were more likely to follow along and look at the pot when the person first expressed an intention to communicate. &quot;Our findings reveal that dogs are receptive to human communication in a manner that was previously attributed only to human infants,&quot; Topál said. As is often the case in research, the results will undoubtedly confirm what many dog owners and trainers already know, the researchers say. Notably, however, it is the first study to use eye-tracking techniques to study dogs&#39; social skills. &quot;By following the eye movements of dogs, we are able to get a firsthand look at how their minds are actually working,&quot; Topál said. &quot;We think that the use of this new eye-tracking technology has many potential surprises in store.&quot;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Ethology">Ethology</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Coping with Abuse in the Work Place</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/5/4972933.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/5/4972933.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 22:42:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Employees keep their distance from the abusive boss&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;Confronting an abusive boss is easier said than done: employees coping with the stress of abusive treatment prefer to avoid direct communication even though it would be the most effective tactic in terms of emotional well-being. This has been shown in a new study from the University of Haifa, published in the &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;International Journal of Stress Management&lt;/span&gt; (American Psychological Association). &quot;Abusive supervision is highly distressing for employees. Our study shows that the strategies being used by employees to cope with the stress caused by such behavior do not lead to the most positive outcomes,&quot; said Prof. Dana Yagil, who headed the study.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Earlier studies have examined the effect of abusive supervision on employee performance, but the new study set out to determine the effect of the different coping strategies on employee well-being. The study, which Prof. Yagil conducted with Prof. Hasida Ben-Zur and Inbal Tamir, of the University of Haifa&#39;s Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, examined five types of strategies used for coping with the stress factor of abusive treatment: directly communicating with the abusive supervisor to discuss the problems; using forms of ingratiation – i.e., doing favors, using flattery and compliance; seeking support from others; avoiding contact with the supervisor; and what is known as &quot;reframing&quot; – mentally restructuring the abuse in a way that decreases its threat.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Participating in the study were 300 employees who were asked to rate the frequency of experiencing abusive behavior by a supervisor, such as ridicule, invasion of privacy, rudeness and lying. The participants were also asked to rate the frequency of engaging in each of 25 strategies that belong to the five categories. For example: &quot;I tell the supervisor directly that he/she must not treat me like that&quot; (direct communication category) ; &quot;I support the supervisor in matters that are important to him/her, so that he/she will see I am on his/her side&quot; (ingratiation); &quot;I try to have the least possible contact with the supervisor (avoidance of contact); &quot;I relieve myself by talking to other people about the supervisor&#39;s behavior&quot; (support-seeking); and &quot;I remind myself that there are more important matters in my life&quot; (reframing).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The study found that abusive treatment from a superior was most strongly associated with avoiding contact – disengaging from the supervisor as much as possible and to seeking social support. Abusive supervision was least strongly associated with the strategy of direct communication. However, avoidance and seeking support resulted in the employees&#39; experiencing negative emotions, while communication with the supervisor – which employees do less - was the strategy most strongly related to employees&#39; positive emotions. &quot;It is understandable that employees wish to reduce their contact with an abusive boss to a minimum,&quot; says Dr. Yagil. &quot;However, this strategy further increases the employee&#39;s stress because it is associated with a sense of weakness and perpetuates their fear of the supervisor.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The study shows that managers should be alert to signs of employee detachment - as it might indicate that their own behavior is being considered offensive by those employees.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/WorkandCareer">Work and Career</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Many NIH-Funded Clinical Trials Go Unpublished Over 2 Years After Completion</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/4/4971839.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2012/1/4/4971839.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 07:08:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>In a study that investigates the challenges of disseminating clinical research findings in peer-reviewed biomedical journals, Yale School of Medicine researchers have found that fewer than half of a sample of trials primarily or partially funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were published within 30 months of completing the clinical trial. These findings appear in the January issue of the &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;British Medical Journal&lt;/span&gt;, which focuses on the topic of unpublished evidence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;When research findings are not disseminated, the scientific process is disrupted and leads to redundant efforts and misconceptions about clinical evidence,&quot; said Joseph Ross, M.D., first author of the study and a Yale assistant professor of medicine. &quot;Such inaction undermines both the trial in question and the evidence available in peer-reviewed medical literature. This has far-reaching implications for policy decisions, and even institutional review board assessments of risks and benefits associated with future research studies.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ross and co-authors performed a cross-sectional analysis of NIH-funded clinical trials registered within ClinicalTrials.gov, a trial registry and results database maintained by the U.S. National Library of Medicine. All trials in the study sample were registered after September 30, 2005 and completed by December 31, 2008, allowing at least 30 months for publication following completion of the trial. They found that overall fewer than half of NIH-funded trials in the sample were published in a peer-reviewed, MEDLINE-indexed biomedical journal within 30 months of trial completion. They also found that one-third of trials remained unpublished 51 months after completion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ross said that there may be many reasons for lack of publication, such as not getting accepted by a journal or not prioritizing the dissemination of research findings. Still, he said, there are alternative methods for providing timely public access to study results, including the results database at ClinicalTrials.gov that was created in response to Federal law. &quot;Steps must be taken to ensure the timely dissemination of publicly funded research so that data from all those who volunteer are available to inform future research and practice,&quot; Ross said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While this study was focused on trials funded by NIH, Ross said that similar problems with non-publication and delayed publication of research findings have been described among trials funded by the pharmaceutical and medical device industries, as well as by non-profit organizations. &quot;This suggests that the current culture of research needs to prioritize the timely public dissemination of research findings, ideally via peer-reviewed journals, for research funded by both public and private sources,&quot; said Ross. &quot;More work needs to be done to better understand impediments to publication.&quot;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Miscellany">Miscellany</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Brain&#39;s Connective Cells Are Much More Than Glue</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/30/4968878.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/30/4968878.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:38:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Glia cells also regulate learning and memory, new Tel Aviv University research finds&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;Glia cells, named for the Greek word for &quot;glue,&quot; hold the brain&#39;s neurons together and protect the cells that determine our thoughts and behaviors, but scientists have long puzzled over their prominence in the activities of the brain dedicated to learning and memory. Now Tel Aviv University researchers say that glia cells are central to the brain&#39;s plasticity — how the brain adapts, learns, and stores information. According to Ph.D. student Maurizio De Pittà of TAU&#39;s Schools of Physics and Astronomy and Electrical Engineering, glia cells do much more than hold the brain together. A mechanism within the glia cells also sorts information for learning purposes, De Pittà says. &quot;Glia cells are like the brain&#39;s supervisors. By regulating the synapses, they control the transfer of information between neurons, affecting how the brain processes information and learns.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;De Pittà&#39;s research, led by his TAU supervisor Prof. Eshel Ben-Jacob, along with Vladislav Volman of The Salk Institute and the University of California at San Diego and Hugues Berry of the Université de Lyon in France, has developed the first computer model that incorporates the influence of glia cells on synaptic information transfer. Detailed in the journal &lt;i&gt;PLoS Computational Biology&lt;/i&gt;, the model can also be implemented in technologies based on brain networks such as microchips and computer software, Prof. Ben-Jacob says, and aid in research on brain disorders such as Alzheimer&#39;s disease and epilepsy.&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regulating the brain&#39;s &quot;social network&quot;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The brain is constituted of two main types of cells: neurons and glia. Neurons fire off signals that dictate how we think and behave, using synapses to pass along the message from one neuron to another, explains De Pittà. Scientists theorize that memory and learning are dictated by synaptic activity because they are &quot;plastic,&quot; with the ability to adapt to different stimuli. But Ben-Jacob and colleagues suspected that glia cells were even more central to how the brain works. Glia cells are abundant in the brain&#39;s hippocampus and the cortex, the two parts of the brain that have the most control over the brain&#39;s ability to process information, learn and memorize. In fact, for every neuron cell, there are two to five glia cells. Taking into account previous experimental data, the researchers were able to build a model that could resolve the puzzle.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The brain is like a social network, says Prof. Ben-Jacob. Messages may originate with the neurons, which use the synapses as their delivery system, but the glia serve as an overall moderator, regulating which messages are sent on and when. These cells can either prompt the transfer of information, or slow activity if the synapses are becoming overactive. This makes the glia cells the guardians of our learning and memory processes, he notes, orchestrating the transmission of information for optimal brain function.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New brain-inspired technologies and therapies&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The team&#39;s findings could have important implications for a number of brain disorders. Almost all neurodegenerative diseases are glia-related pathologies, Prof. Ben-Jacob notes. In epileptic seizures, for example, the neurons&#39; activity at one brain location propagates and overtakes the normal activity at other locations. This can happen when the glia cells fail to properly regulate synaptic transmission. Alternatively, when brain activity is low, glia cells boost transmissions of information, keeping the connections between neurons &quot;alive.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The model provides a &quot;new view&quot; of how the brain functions. While the study was in press, two experimental works appeared that supported the model&#39;s predictions. &quot;A growing number of scientists are starting to recognize the fact that you need the glia to perform tasks that neurons alone can&#39;t accomplish in an efficient way,&quot; says De Pittà. The model will provide a new tool to begin revising the theories of computational neuroscience and lead to more realistic brain-inspired algorithms and microchips, which are designed to mimic neuronal networks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Neuropsychology">Neuropsychology</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Pro/Con: Spanking</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/29/4968136.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/29/4968136.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 06:46:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Pro: Studies show that spanking, properly utilized, can lead to well-adjusted children. Con: Spanking is harmful and can hinder kids later in life. &lt;/span&gt;[read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/health/la-he-spanking-pro-con-20111226,0,5993621.story&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; from latimes.com]&lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/LifespanDevelopment">Lifespan Development</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>New Analysis Casts Doubt on Results of Tobacco Industry Studies into Safety of Cigarette Additives</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/22/4963936.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/22/4963936.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:57:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;New analysis casts doubt on results of tobacco industry studies into safety of cigarette additives&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Published tobacco industry scientific research on the safety of cigarette additives cannot be taken at face value, according to an analysis led by Stanton Glantz from the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at the University of California in San Francisco, and published in this week&#39;s &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;PLoS Medicine&lt;/span&gt;. In the &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;PLoS Medicine&lt;/span&gt; study, the authors reanalyzed data from &quot;Project MIX&quot; in which chemical analyses of smoke, and the potential toxicity of 333 cigarette additives were conducted by scientists from the tobacco company Philip Morris. The results of these analyses were published in Food and Chemical Toxicology in 2002.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The authors of the independent analysis used documents made public as a result of litigation against the tobacco industry to investigate the origins and design of Project MIX, and to conduct their own analyses of the results. Internal documents revealed post-hoc changes in analytical protocols after the industry scientists found that the additives increased cigarette toxicity by increasing the number of particles in the cigarette smoke. Crucially, the authors also found that in the original Project MIX analysis, the published papers obscured findings of toxicity by adjusting the data by Total Particulate Matter concentration: when the authors conducted their own analysis by studying additives per cigarette, they found that 15 carcinogenic chemicals increased by 20% or more. The authors also found that the failure to identify many toxic biological effects was because the studies Philip Morris carried out were too small to reliably detect toxic effects.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The authors conclude that their independent analysis provides evidence for the elimination of the use of the studied additives (including menthol) from cigarettes on public health grounds. The authors say: &quot;The results demonstrate that toxins in cigarette smoke increase substantially when additives are put in cigarettes, including the level of [Total Particulate Matter]. In particular, regulatory authorities, including the [Food and Drug Administration] and similar agencies elsewhere, could use the Project MIX data to eliminate the use of these 333 additives (including menthol) from cigarettes.&quot;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/DepartmentofDuh">Department of Duh</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>School Absenteeism, Mental Health Problems Linked</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/22/4963934.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/22/4963934.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:36:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>School absenteeism is a significant problem, and students who are frequently absent from school more often have symptoms of psychiatric disorders. A new longitudinal study of more than 17,000 youths has found that frequently missing school is associated with a higher prevalence of mental health problems later on in adolescence, and that mental health problems during one year also predict missing additional school days in the following year for students in middle and high school. The study, published in the journal &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Child Development&lt;/span&gt;, was conducted by researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), the University of Florida, Boston University, the Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, the Oregon Social Learning Center, and Johns Hopkins University. &quot;We&#39;ve long known that students who are frequently absent from school are more likely to have symptoms of psychiatric disorders, but less clear is the reason why,&quot; says Jeffrey Wood, associate professor of educational psychology and psychiatry at UCLA, who led the study. &quot;These two aspects of youths&#39; adjustment may at times exacerbate one another, leading over the course of time to more of each.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The study found that between grades 2 and 8, students who already had mental health symptoms (such as antisocial behavior or depression) missed more school days over the course of a year than they had in the previous year and than students with few or no mental health symptoms. Conversely, middle and high school students who were chronically absent in an earlier year of the study tended to have more depression and antisocial problems in subsequent years. For example, 8th graders who were absent more than 20 days were more likely to have higher levels of anxiety and depression in 10th grade than were 8th graders who were absent fewer than 20 days.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;The findings can help inform the development of programs to reduce school absenteeism,&quot; according to Wood. &quot;School personnel in middle schools and high schools could benefit from knowing that mental health issues and school absenteeism each influence the other over time. Helping students address mental health issues may in turn help prevent the emergence of chronic absenteeism. At the same time, working to help students who are developing a pattern of chronic absenteeism come to school more consistently may help prevent psychiatric problems.&quot; The researchers looked at more than 17,000 children in 1st through 12th grades using three datasets: the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, a longitudinal study of a nationally representative sample of adolescents in grades 7 to 12; the Johns Hopkins Prevention Intervention Research Center Study, a longitudinal study of classroom-based interventions involving children in grades 1 to 8; and the Linking the Interests of Families and Teachers trial, a longitudinal study of children in grades 1 through 12. Researchers interviewed students and parents annually or biennially, and they gathered information from school attendance records. In addition, students, parents, and teachers filled out questionnaires.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/LifespanDevelopment">Lifespan Development</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/PsychDisorders">Psych Disorders</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Crows Show Advanced Learning Abilities</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/18/4961270.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/18/4961270.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 08:13:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>New Caledonian crows have, in the past, distinguished themselves with their advanced tool using abilities. A team of researchers from the University of Auckland and the University of Cambridge have now shown these crows can learn to use new types of tools. When confronted with the Aesop&#39;s fable paradigm, which requires stones to be dropped into a water-filled tube to bring floating food within reach, the crows quickly learned to use stones as tools. They then preferred to drop into the tube large rocks rather than small rocks, and heavy objects over light objects (which floated on the surface of the water and so were ineffective).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Further experiments showed that the crows&#39; performances were not based on simple learning, which suggests that the crows had some understanding of how the task actually worked. The authors, therefore, concluded that these crows have cognitive mechanisms beyond simple associative learning that are capable of processing causal information about novel tool types.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For more insight into the intelligence of crows, watch &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/episodes/a-murder-of-crows/full-episode/5977/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;A Murder of Crows&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (~50 min.) at pbs.org.&lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Ethology">Ethology</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Learning">Learning</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>The Ability to Love Takes Root in Earliest Infancy</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/17/4960977.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/17/4960977.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 22:43:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>The ability to trust, love, and resolve conflict with loved ones starts in childhood—way earlier than you may think. That is one message of a new review of the literature in &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Current Directions in Psychological Science&lt;/span&gt;, a journal published by the Association for Psychological Science. &quot;Your interpersonal experiences with your mother during the first 12 to 18 months of life predict your behavior in romantic relationships 20 years later,&quot; says psychologist Jeffry A. Simpson, the author, with University of Minnesota colleagues W. Andrew Collins and Jessica E. Salvatore. &quot;Before you can remember, before you have language to describe it, and in ways you aren&#39;t aware of, implicit attitudes get encoded into the mind,&quot; about how you&#39;ll be treated or how worthy you are of love and affection.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While those attitudes can change with new relationships, introspection, and therapy, in times of stress old patterns often reassert themselves. The mistreated infant becomes the defensive arguer; the baby whose mom was attentive and supportive works through problems, secure in the goodwill of the other person. This is an &quot;organizational&quot; view of human social development. Explains Simpson: &quot;People find a coherent, adaptive way, as best as they can, to respond to their current environments based on what&#39;s happened to them in the past.&quot; What happens to you as a baby affects the adult you become: It&#39;s not such a new idea for psychology—but solid evidence for it has been lacking.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Simpson, Collins, and Salvatore have been providing that evidence: investigating the links between mother-infant relationships and later love partnerships as part of the Minnesota Longitudinal Study of Risk and Adaptation. Their subjects are 75 children of low-income mothers whom they&#39;ve been assessing from birth into their early 30s, including their close friends and romantic partners. When the children were infants, they were put into strange or stressful situations with their mothers to test how securely the pairs were bonded. Since then, the children—who are now adults—have returned regularly for assessments of their emotional and social development. The authors have focused on their skills and resilience in working through conflicts with school peers, teenage best friends, and finally, love partners.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Through multiple analyses, the research has yielded evidence of that early encoding—confirming earlier psychological theories. But their findings depart from their predecessors&#39; ideas, too. &quot;Psychologists started off thinking there was a lot of continuity in a person&#39;s traits and behavior over time,&quot; says Simpson. &quot;We find a weak but important thread&quot; between the infant in the mother&#39;s arms and the 20-year-old in his lover&#39;s. But &quot;one thing has struck us over the years: It&#39;s often harder to find evidence for stable continuity than for change on many measures.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The good news: &quot;If you can figure out what those old models are and verbalize them,&quot; and if you get involved with a committed, trustworthy partner, says Simpson, &quot;you may be able to revise your models and calibrate your behavior differently.&quot; Old patterns can be overcome. A betrayed baby can become loyal. An unloved infant can learn to love.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/LifespanDevelopment">Lifespan Development</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Helping Your Fellow Rat: Rodents Show Empathy-Driven Behavior</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/17/4960982.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/17/4960982.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 22:33:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Rats free trapped companions, even when given choice of chocolate instead&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The first evidence of empathy-driven helping behavior in rodents has been observed in laboratory rats that repeatedly free companions from a restraint, according to a new study by University of Chicago neuroscientists. The observation, published in &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Science&lt;/span&gt;, places the origin of pro-social helping behavior earlier in the evolutionary tree than previously thought. Though empathetic behavior has been observed anecdotally in non-human primates and other wild species, the concept had not previously been observed in rodents in a laboratory setting. &quot;This is the first evidence of helping behavior triggered by empathy in rats,&quot; said Jean Decety, PhD, Irving B. Harris Professor of Psychology and Psychiatry at the University of Chicago. &quot;There are a lot of ideas in the literature showing that empathy is not unique to humans, and it has been well demonstrated in apes, but in rodents it was not very clear. We put together in one series of experiments evidence of helping behavior based on empathy in rodents, and that&#39;s really the first time it&#39;s been seen.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The study demonstrates the deep evolutionary roots of empathy-driven behavior, said Jeffrey Mogil, the E.P. Taylor Professor in Pain Studies at McGill University, who has studied emotional contagion of pain in mice. &quot;On its face, this is more than empathy, this is pro-social behavior,&quot; said Mogil, who was not involved in the study. &quot;It&#39;s more than has been shown before by a long shot, and that&#39;s very impressive, especially since there&#39;s no advanced technology here.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The experiments, designed by psychology graduate student and first author Inbal Ben-Ami Bartal with co-authors Decety and Peggy Mason, placed two rats that normally share a cage into a special test arena. One rat was held in a restrainer device — a closed tube with a door that can be nudged open from the outside. The second rat roamed free in the cage around the restrainer, able to see and hear the trapped cagemate but not required to take action. The researchers observed that the free rat acted more agitated when its cagemate was restrained, compared to its activity when the rat was placed in a cage with an empty restrainer. This response offered evidence of an &quot;emotional contagion,&quot; a frequently observed phenomenon in humans and animals in which a subject shares in the fear, distress or even pain suffered by another subject.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While emotional contagion is the simplest form of empathy, the rats&#39; subsequent actions clearly comprised active helping behavior, a far more complex expression of empathy. After several daily restraint sessions, the free rat learned how to open the restrainer door and free its cagemate. Though slow to act at first, once the rat discovered the ability to free its companion, it would take action almost immediately upon placement in the test arena. &quot;We are not training these rats in any way,&quot; Bartal said. &quot;These rats are learning because they are motivated by something internal. We&#39;re not showing them how to open the door, they don&#39;t get any previous exposure on opening the door, and it&#39;s hard to open the door. But they keep trying and trying, and it eventually works.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To control for motivations other than empathy that would lead the rat to free its companion, the researchers conducted further experiments. When a stuffed toy rat was placed in the restrainer, the free rat did not open the door. When opening the restrainer door released his companion into a separate compartment, the free rat continued to nudge open the door, ruling out the reward of social interaction as motivation. The experiments left behavior motivated by empathy as the simplest explanation for the rats&#39; behavior. &quot;There was no other reason to take this action, except to terminate the distress of the trapped rats,&quot; Bartal said. &quot;In the rat model world, seeing the same behavior repeated over and over basically means that this action is rewarding to the rat.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a test of the power of this reward, another experiment was designed to give the free rats a choice: free their companion or feast on chocolate. Two restrainers were placed in the cage with the rat, one containing the cagemate, another containing a pile of chocolate chips. Though the free rat had the option of eating all the chocolate before freeing its companion, the rat was equally likely to open the restrainer containing the cagemate before opening the chocolate container. &quot;That was very compelling,&quot; said Mason, PhD, Professor of Neurobiology. &quot;It said to us that essentially helping their cagemate is on a par with chocolate. He can hog the entire chocolate stash if he wanted to, and he does not. We were shocked.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now that this model of empathic behavior has been established, the researchers are carrying out additional experiments. Because not every rat learned to open the door and free its companion, studies can compare these individuals to look for the biological source of these behavioral differences. Early results suggested that females were more likely to become door openers than males, perhaps reflecting the important role of empathy in motherhood and providing another avenue for study. &quot;This model of empathy and helping behavior opens the path for elucidating aspects of the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms that were not accessible until now.&quot; Bartal said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The experiments also provide further evidence that empathy-driven helping behavior is not unique to humans – and suggest that Homo sapiens could learn a lesson from its rat cousins. &quot;When we act without empathy we are acting against our biological inheritance,&quot; Mason said. &quot;If humans would listen and act on their biological inheritance more often, we&#39;d be better off.&quot;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Ethology">Ethology</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/SocialPsychSocialIssues">Social Psych/Social Issues</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>A Brain&#39;s Failure to Appreciate Others May Permit Human Atrocities</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/17/4960980.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/17/4960980.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 22:30:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>A father in Louisiana bludgeoned and beheaded his disabled 7-year-old son last August because he no longer wanted to care for the boy. For most people, such a heinous act is unconscionable. But it may be that a person can become callous enough to commit human atrocities because of a failure in the part of the brain that&#39;s critical for social interaction. A new study by researchers at Duke University and Princeton University suggests this function may disengage when people encounter others they consider disgusting, thus &quot;dehumanizing&quot; their victims by failing to acknowledge they have thoughts and feelings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This shortcoming also may help explain how propaganda depicting Tutsi in Rwanda as cockroaches and Hitler&#39;s classification of Jews in Nazi Germany as vermin contributed to torture and genocide, the study said. &quot;When we encounter a person, we usually infer something about their minds. Sometimes, we fail to do this, opening up the possibility that we do not perceive the person as fully human,&quot; said lead author Lasana Harris, an assistant professor in Duke University&#39;s Department of Psychology &amp;amp; Neuroscience and Center for Cognitive Neuroscience. Harris co-authored the study with Susan Fiske, a professor of psychology at Princeton University.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Social neuroscience has shown through MRI studies that people normally activate a network in the brain related to social cognition -- thoughts, feelings, empathy, for example -- when viewing pictures of others or thinking about their thoughts. But when participants in this study were asked to consider images of people they considered drug addicts, homeless people, and others they deemed low on the social ladder, parts of this network failed to engage. What&#39;s especially striking, the researchers said, is that people will easily ascribe social cognition -- a belief in an internal life such as emotions -- to animals and cars, but will avoid making eye contact with the homeless panhandler in the subway. &quot;We need to think about other people&#39;s experience,&quot; Fiske said. &quot;It&#39;s what makes them fully human to us.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The duo&#39;s previous research suggested that a lack of social cognition can be linked to not acknowledging the mind of other people when imagining a day in their life, and rating them differently on traits that we think differentiate humans from everything else. This latest study expands on that earlier work to show that these traits correlate with activation in brain regions beyond the social cognition network. These areas include those brain areas involved in disgust, attention and cognitive control. The result is what the researchers call &quot;dehumanized perception,&quot; or failing to consider someone else&#39;s mind. Such a lack of empathy toward others can also help explain why some members of society are sometimes dehumanized, they said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For this latest study, 119 undergraduates from Princeton completed judgment and decision-making surveys as they viewed images of people. The researchers sought to examine the students&#39; responses to common emotions triggered by images such as:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;a female college student and male American firefighter (pride)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;a business woman and rich man (envy)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;an elderly man and disabled woman (pity)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;a female homeless person and male drug addict (disgust)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;After imagining a day in the life of the people in the images, participants next rated the same person on various dimensions. They rated characteristics including the warmth, competence, similarity, familiarity, responsibility of the person for his/her situation, control of the person over their situation, intelligence, complex emotionality, self-awareness, ups-and-downs in life, and typical humanity. Participants then went into the MRI scanner and simply looked at pictures of people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The study found that the neural network involved in social interaction failed to respond to images of drug addicts, the homeless, immigrants and poor people, replicating earlier results. &quot;These results suggest multiple roots to dehumanization,&quot; Harris said. &quot;This suggests that dehumanization is a complex phenomenon, and future research is necessary to more accurately specify this complexity.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The sample&#39;s mean age was 20, with 62 female participants. The ethnic composition of the Princeton students who participated in the study was 68 white, 19 Asian, 12 of mixed descent, and 6 black, with the remainder not reporting.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/SocialPsychSocialIssues">Social Psych/Social Issues</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Child Abuse Changes the Brain</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/16/4960024.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/16/4960024.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:22:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>When children have been exposed to family violence, their brains become increasingly &quot;tuned&quot; for processing possible sources of threat, a new study reports. The findings, reported in the December 6th issue of &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Current Biology&lt;/span&gt;, a Cell Press publication, reveal the same pattern of brain activity in these children as seen previously in soldiers exposed to combat. The study is the first to apply functional brain imaging to explore the impact of physical abuse or domestic violence on the emotional development of children, according to the researchers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Enhanced reactivity to a biologically salient threat cue such as anger may represent an adaptive response for these children in the short term, helping keep them out of danger,&quot; said Eamon McCrory of University College London. &quot;However, it may also constitute an underlying neurobiological risk factor increasing their vulnerability to later mental health problems, and particularly anxiety.&quot; Maltreatment is known to be one of the most potent environmental risk factors associated with anxiety and depression. Still, McCrory said, &quot;relatively little is known how such adversity &#39;gets under the skin&#39; and increases a child&#39;s later vulnerability, even into adulthood.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The new study shows that children with documented exposure to violence in the home differ in their brain response to angry versus sad faces. When presented with angry faces, children with a history of abuse show heightened activity in the brain&#39;s anterior insula and amygdala, regions involved in detecting threat and anticipating pain. McCrory says the changes don&#39;t reflect damage to the brain. Rather, the patterns represent the brain&#39;s way of adapting to a challenging or dangerous environment. Still, those shifts may come at the cost of increased vulnerability to later stress.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although the results may not have immediate practical implications, they are nonetheless critical given that a significant minority of children are exposed to family violence, McCrory says. &quot;This underlines the importance of taking seriously the impact for a child of living in a family characterized by violence. Even if such a child is not showing overt signs of anxiety or depression, these experiences still appear to have a measurable effect at the neural level.&quot;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Neuropsychology">Neuropsychology</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/PsychDisorders">Psych Disorders</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/StressHealthandIllness">Stress, Health and Illness</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Where is the Accurate Memory? The Eyes Have It</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/16/4960027.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2011/12/16/4960027.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:09:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>The witness points out the criminal in a police lineup. She swears she&#39;d remember that face forever. Then DNA evidence shows she&#39;s got the wrong guy. It happens so frequently that many courts are looking with extreme skepticism at eyewitness testimony.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is there a way to get a more accurate reading of memory? A new study says yes. &quot;Eye movements are drawn quickly to remembered objects,&quot; says Deborah Hannula, assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, who conducted the study with Carol L. Baym and Neal J. Cohen of the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign and David E. Warren of the University of Iowa College of Medicine. Tracking where and for how long a person focuses his or her eyes &quot;can distinguish previously seen from novel materials even when behavioral reports fail to do so.&quot; The findings will appear in an upcoming issue of &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Psychological Science&lt;/span&gt;, a journal published by the Association for Psychological Science.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The researchers gave university students 36 faces to study. These target faces were also morphed to produce images closely resembling them; the morphed phases were not seen during the study phase. The students were then shown 36 three-face displays, one at a time. Told that the studied faces wouldn&#39;t always be there, the participants had to press a button indicating which face was the studied one, or simply choose a face if they felt none had been studied. They then reported verbally whether the studied target face was present or not. While they looked at the 3-face display, their eye movements were recorded, tracking where the eyes focused first and what proportion of time was spent looking there. For the analysis, the psychologists divided the faces into three groups: studied targets; morphs mistaken for the &quot;target&quot; face; and morphs chosen and known to be incorrect.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Participants easily identified the target faces most of the time. They also spent more time looking at these faces, and did so soon after the 3-face display had been presented. &quot;The really interesting finding is that before they chose a face and pressed a button, there was disproportionate viewing of the target faces as compared to either type of selected face,&quot; said Hannula. However, &quot;after the response was made, viewing tended to mimic the behavioral endorsement of a face as studied or not, whether that endorsement was correct or incorrect.&quot; In other words, &quot;pre-response viewing seems to reflect actual experience, and post-response viewing seems to reflect the decision making process and whether or not the face will be endorsed as studied.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hannula theorizes as to what is happening: &quot;Early disproportionate viewing of the target face may precede and help give rise to awareness that a particular face has been studied. Subsequently, we begin to think about the choice that we&#39;re making&quot;—we look closely, compare and weigh the options—&quot;these cognitive processes permit us to make a decision, but may also lead us down the wrong path. In this case, leading us to endorse a face as studied despite having never seen it before.&quot; Aside from the potential for practical application, says Hannula, eye movement methods could be used to examine memory in individuals—like some psychiatric patients and children – who may have trouble communicating what it is that they remember. &quot;Eye movements might provide us with more information about what exactly these individuals remember than behavioral reports alone.&quot; &lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Memory">Memory</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
</channel>
</rss>

