<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:ent="http://www.purl.org/NET/ENT/1.0/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
  <title>Synapse</title>
  <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog</link>
  <description>Things of interest from psychology past and present.</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:55:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
  <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
  <generator>Blogware</generator>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Study Examines Sexual Orientation and Bullying Among Adolescents</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/3/6/4473688.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/3/6/4473688.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:52:28 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;New study finds sexual minority youth bullied more than heterosexual youth&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The act and victimization of bullying continues to be a problem among today&#39;s youth. While many children are experiencing this form of violence, it is more prevalent in children that are different from the social norm. As medical professionals continue to further their understanding of bullying, research shows a high rate of sexual minority youth who experience this harmful activity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A new study conducted by doctors at Nationwide Children&#39;s Hospital found that sexual minority youth, or teens that identify themselves as gay, lesbian or bisexual, are bullied two to three times more than heterosexuals.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to the study that is now available online in the &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Journal of Adolescent Health&lt;/span&gt;, sexual minority youth are more vulnerable to a variety of physical and mental domains such as bullying or suicidal thoughts. Plus, the study found that many older adolescents reported being bullied.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;There is a need for health care professionals, and others who work with children, to be aware that sexual minority youth are more likely to be victims of bullying and other forms of violence,&quot; said Elise Berlan, MD, lead author and physician in Adolescent Medicine at Nationwide Children&#39;s Hospital. &quot;Parents should also take time to communicate with their children about sensitive topics such as sexuality, peer relations and violence.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Researchers examined the relationship between sexual orientation and bullying from the Growing Up Today Study (GUTS), an on-going study of American adolescents, which included information on more than 7,500 adolescents. While examining the results from the 2001 survey, the study also showed that youth identifying themselves as gay or lesbian were less likely to bully others and more likely to report being bullied than heterosexual teens.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Children that are different from the social norm often become targets of social isolation, harassment and bullying. Recommended strategies to identify this type of abusive behavior include encouraging clinicians to routinely inquire about sexual orientation and their experiences with bullying, interpersonal violence and abuse; screening sexual minority youth for depression, suicidality and involvement in high-risk behaviors; and increasing the support of school policies to ensure a safe learning environment for all students.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Students, parents, schools and community organizations can work to create environments that are supportive and accepting of all students, regardless of their sexual orientation,&quot; said Berlan, also a faculty member at The Ohio State University College of Medicine. &quot;Schools, in particular, need to work to increase the awareness of bullying.&quot; &lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/SocialPsych">Social Psych</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>A Mind at Rest Strengthens Memories, NYU Researchers Find</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/3/6/4473687.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/3/6/4473687.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:50:19 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>Our memories are strengthened during periods of rest while we are awake, researchers at New York University have found. The findings, which appear in the latest issue of the journal &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Neuron&lt;/span&gt;, expand our understanding of how memories are boosted—previous studies had shown this process occurs during sleep, but not during times of awake rest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Taking a coffee break after class can actually help you retain that information you just learned,&quot; explained Lila Davachi, an assistant professor in NYU&#39;s Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, in whose laboratory the study was conducted. &quot;Your brain wants you to tune out other tasks so you can tune in to what you just learned.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The study, whose lead author was Arielle Tambini, a doctoral candidate in NYU&#39;s Graduate School of Arts and Science, focused on memory consolidation—the period when a memory is stabilized after it is initially created, or encoded. To determine if memory consolidation occurred during periods of awake rest, the researchers imaged the hippocampus, a brain structure known to play a significant role in memory, and cortical regions during periods of awake rest. Previous studies have demonstrated regions of the brain more active during periods of rest, but their function at these times had been unclear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The NYU experiment tested subjects&#39; associative memory by showing them pairs of images containing a human face and an object (e.g., a beach ball) or a human face and a scene (e.g., a beach) followed by periods of awake rest. Subjects were not informed their memory for these images would later be tested, but, rather, were instructed to rest and simply think about anything that they wanted, but to remain awake during the resting periods. The researchers used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to gauge activity in the hippocampus and cortical regions during the task and during the ensuing rest period.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The experiment yielded two noteworthy results. First, the researchers found that during rest after the study experience (after the visuals were shown), there was a significant correlation between brain activity in the subjects&#39; hippocampus and cortical regions that were active during the initial encoding of each stimulus pair. However, this boost in brain correlations was only seen following experiences that were later memorable suggesting these parts of the brain act in tandem for a purpose — to consolidate memories during rest. Second, when examining each subject individually, it was found that subjects who had greater resting correlations between the hippocampus and cortex, also exhibited better performance on a subsequent associative memory test and those whose brain correlations were weaker, had worse memory — in other words, the greater the activity in hippocampus and cortical regions, the stronger the memory.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Your brain is working for you when you&#39;re resting, so rest is important for memory and cognitive function,&quot; Davachi observed. &quot;This is something we don&#39;t appreciate much, especially when today&#39;s information technologies keep us working round-the-clock.&quot;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Memory">Memory</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>West Brain, East Brain</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/2/20/4461214.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/2/20/4461214.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:25:11 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsweek.com/id/233778&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;What a difference culture makes&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Biopsychology">Biopsychology</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/LanguageandThought">Language and Thought</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Study: Believers’ Inferences about God’s Beliefs are Uniquely Egocentric</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/1/29/4442214.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/1/29/4442214.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:38:21 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>Religious people tend to use their own beliefs as a guide in thinking about what God believes, but are less constrained when reasoning about other people’s beliefs, according to new study published in the Nov. 30 early edition of the &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nicholas Epley, professor of behavioral science at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, led the research, which included a series of survey and neuroimaging studies to examine the extent to which people’s own beliefs guide their predictions about God’s beliefs. The findings of Epley and his co-authors at Australia’s Monash University and UChicago extend existing work in psychology showing that people are often egocentric when they infer other people’s beliefs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The PNAS paper reports the results of seven separate studies. The first four include surveys of Boston rail commuters, UChicago undergraduate students and a nationally representative database of online respondents in the United States. In these surveys, participants reported their own belief about an issue, their estimated God’s belief, along with a variety of others, including Microsoft founder Bill Gates, Major League Baseball’s Barry Bonds, President George W. Bush, and an average American.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Two other studies directly manipulated people’s own beliefs and found that inferences about God’s beliefs tracked their own beliefs. Study participants were asked, for example, to write and deliver a speech that supported or opposed the death penalty in front of a video camera. Their beliefs were surveyed both before and after the speech.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The final study involved functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure the neural activity of test subjects as they reasoned about their own beliefs versus those of God or another person. The data demonstrated that reasoning about God’s beliefs activated many of the same regions that become active when people reasoned about their own beliefs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The researchers noted that people often set their moral compasses according to what they presume to be God’s standards. “The central feature of a compass, however, is that it points north no matter what direction a person is facing,” they conclude. “This research suggests that, unlike an actual compass, inferences about God’s beliefs may instead point people further in whatever direction they are already facing.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the research in no way denies the possibility that God’s presumed beliefs also may provide guidance in situations where people are uncertain of their own beliefs, the co-authors noted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Citation: “Believers’ estimates of God’s beliefs are more egocentric than estimates of other people’s beliefs,” Nov. 30, 2009, early edition of the &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences&lt;/span&gt;, by Nicholas Epley, Benjamin A. Converse, Alexa Delbosc, George A. Monteleone and John T. Cacioppo.”</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/CognitivePsych">Cognitive Psych</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Miscellany">Miscellany</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Do Children Need Both a Mother and a Father?</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/1/22/4435457.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/1/22/4435457.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:28:25 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;New study examines if the gender of parents matter&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;The presumption that children need both a mother and a father is widespread. It has been used by proponents of Proposition 8 to argue against same-sex marriage and to uphold a ban on same-sex adoption.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other end of the political spectrum, Barack Obama endorsed the vital role of fathers in a 2008 speech: &quot;Of all the rocks upon which we build our lives, we are reminded today that family is the most important. And we are called to recognize and honor how critical every father is to that foundation.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The lead article in the February issue of &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Journal of Marriage and Family&lt;/span&gt; challenges the idea that &quot;fatherless&quot; children are necessarily at a disadvantage or that men provide a different, indispensable set of parenting skills than women.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Significant policy decisions have been swayed by the misconception across party lines that children need both a mother and a father. Yet, there is almost no social science research to support this claim. One problem is that proponents of this view routinely ignore research on same-gender parents,&quot; said sociologist Timothy Biblarz of the USC College of Letters, Arts and Sciences.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Extending their prior work on gender and family, Biblarz and Judith Stacey of NYU analyzed relevant studies about parenting, including available research on single-mother and single-father households, gay male parents and lesbian parents. &quot;That a child needs a male parent and a female parent is so taken for granted that people are uncritical,&quot; Stacey said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In their analysis, the researchers found no evidence of gender-based parenting abilities, with the &quot;partial exception of lactation,&quot; noting that very little about the gender of the parent has significance for children&#39;s psychological adjustment and social success.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As the researchers write: &quot;The social science research that is routinely cited does not actually speak to the questions of whether or not children need both a mother and a father at home. Instead proponents generally cite research that compares [heterosexual two-parent] families with single parents, thus conflating the number with the gender of parents.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indeed, there are far more similarities than differences among children of lesbian and heterosexual parents, according to the study. On average, two mothers tended to play with their children more, were less likely to use physical discipline, and were less likely to raise children with chauvinistic attitudes. Studies of gay male families are still limited.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, like two heterosexual parents, new parenthood among lesbians increased stress and conflict, exacerbated by general lack of legal recognition of commitment. Also, lesbian biological mothers typically assumed greater caregiving responsibility than their partners, reflecting inequities among heterosexual couples.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;The bottom line is that the science shows that children raised by two same-gender parents do as well on average as children raised by two different-gender parents. This is obviously inconsistent with the widespread claim that children must be raised by a mother and a father to do well,&quot; Biblarz said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stacey concluded: &quot;The family type that is best for children is one that has responsible, committed, stable parenting. Two parents are, on average, better than one, but one really good parent is better than two not-so-good ones. The gender of parents only matters in ways that don&#39;t matter.&quot;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Development">Development</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>McGill-CHUM Study: 56 Percent of Young Adults in a New Sexual Relationship Infected with HPV</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/1/20/4433421.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/1/20/4433421.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:45:03 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;First-of-its-kind work sheds light on HPV transmission&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A groundbreaking study of couples led by Professor Eduardo Franco, Director of McGill University&#39;s Cancer Epidemiology Unit, in collaboration with a team of colleagues from McGill and Université de Montréal/Centre Hospitalier de l&#39;Université de Montréal (CHUM), found more than half (56 per cent) of young adults in a new sexual relationship were infected with human papillomavirus (HPV). Of those, nearly half (44 per cent) were infected with an HPV type that causes cancer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dr. Ann Burchell, the Project Coordinator and a former PhD student and post-doctoral fellow with Dr. Franco at the Cancer Epidemiology Unit, conducted the HITCH Cohort Study (HPV Infection and Transmission in Couples through Heterosexual activity) to determine the prevalence of HPV infections among recently formed couples. This is the first large-scale study of HPV infection among couples early in their sexual relationships when transmission is most likely.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The results, published in the January 2010 issues of &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Epidemiology and Sexually Transmitted Diseases&lt;/span&gt;, also indicate there is a high probability of HPV transmission between partners. When one partner had HPV, the researchers observed that in 42 per cent of couples, the other partner also had the infection. Moreover, the researchers found that the presence of HPV in one partner was the strongest predictor of finding the same HPV type in the other partner. If one partner was infected with HPV, the other partner&#39;s chance of also being infected with the same HPV type increased over 50 times.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;These results build on our knowledge that HPV infection is very common among young adults, and underline the importance of prevention programs for HPV-associated diseases such as cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination,&quot; said Dr. Ann Burchell. &quot;Our results also suggest that HPV is an easy virus to get and to transmit. Our estimates of the HPV transmission probability will be of use to other researchers who use modeling to project the public health and economic impact of HPV vaccination strategies.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;HITCH Cohort Study participants are young women attending university or college/CEGEP in Montreal, Quebec, and their male partners. New couples are defined as those who have been together for six months or less. Participants fill out questionnaires in which they answer questions about their sexual history and they also provide genital specimens for laboratory testing for the presence of HPV infection. Recruitment for the study is continuing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Our study is the first to investigate HPV transmission in a large number of new couples among young adults,&quot; says Dr. François Coutlée, a professor at the Université de Montréal Department of Microbiology and Immunology and researcher at the Centre Hospitalier de l&#39;Université de Montréal where the HPV tests were analyzed. &quot;The results suggest that many HPV transmissions occur at the start of new relationships, which reinforces the need for prevention.&quot;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Miscellany">Miscellany</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Study Reveals Wanted Objects are Seen as Closer</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/1/20/4433418.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/1/20/4433418.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:41:36 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>We assume that we see things as they really are. But according to a new report in &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Psychological Science&lt;/span&gt;, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, if we really want something, that desire may influence how we view our surroundings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Psychological scientists Emily Balcetis from New York University and David Dunning from Cornell University conducted a set of studies to see how our desires affect perception. In the first experiment, participants had to estimate how far a water bottle was from where they were sitting. Half of the volunteers were allowed to drink water before the experiment, while the others ate salty pretzels, thus becoming very thirsty. The results showed that the thirsty volunteers estimated the water as being closer to them than volunteers who drank water earlier.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our desire for certain objects may also result in behavioral changes. In a separate experiment, volunteers tossed a beanbag towards a gift card (worth either $25 or $0) on the floor, winning the card if the beanbag landed on it. Interestingly, the volunteers threw the beanbag much farther if the gift card was worth $0 than if it was worth $25 — that is, they underthrew the beanbag when attempting to win a $25 gift card, because they viewed that gift card as being closer to them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These findings indicate that when we want something, we actually view it as being physically close to us. The authors suggest that &quot;these biases arise in order to encourage perceivers to engage in behaviors leading to the acquisition of the object.&quot; In other words, when we see a goal as being close to us (literally within our reach), it motivates us to keep on going to successfully attain it.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/SensationandPerception">Sensation and Perception</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Worldwide Study Finds Few Gender Differences in Math Abilities</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/1/6/4421644.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/1/6/4421644.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 06:55:07 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Gender gaps linked to status of women, according to new analysis&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Girls around the world are not worse at math than boys, even though boys are more confident in their math abilities, and girls from countries where gender equity is more prevalent are more likely to perform better on mathematics assessment tests, according to a new analysis of international research.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Stereotypes about female inferiority in mathematics are a distinct contrast to the actual scientific data,&quot; said Nicole Else-Quest, PhD, a psychology professor at Villanova University, and lead author of the meta-analysis. &quot;These results show that girls will perform at the same level as the boys when they are given the right educational tools and have visible female role models excelling in mathematics.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The results are reported in the latest issue of &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Psychological Bulletin&lt;/span&gt;, published by the American Psychological Association. The finding that girls around the world appear to have less confidence in their mathematical abilities could help explain why young girls are less likely than boys to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Else-Quest and her fellow researchers examined data from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study and the Programme for International Student Assessment, representing 493,495 students ages 14-16 from 69 countries. Both studies&#39; results were released in 2003, and not all countries participated in both assessments. The TIMSS focuses on basic math knowledge, while the PISA test assesses students&#39; ability to use their math skills in the real world. The researchers felt these two tests offered a good sampling of students&#39; math abilities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While these measures tested different math abilities, there were only small gender differences for each, on average. However, from nation to nation, the size of the gender differences varied a great deal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The two studies also assessed students&#39; level of confidence in their math abilities and how important they felt it was to do well in math in order to have a successful career. Despite overall similarities in math skills, boys felt significantly more confident in their abilities than girls did and were more motivated to do well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The researchers also looked at different measures of women&#39;s education, political involvement, welfare and income in each country. There was some variability among countries when it came to gender differences in math and how it related to the status and welfare of women. For example, if certain countries had more women in research-related positions, the girls in that country were more likely to do better in math and feel more confident of those skills.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;This meta-analysis shows us that while the quality of instruction and curriculum affects children&#39;s learning, so do the value that schools, teachers and families place on girls&#39; learning math. Girls are likely to perform as well as boys when they are encouraged to succeed,&quot; said Else-Quest.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Miscellany">Miscellany</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/SocialPsych">Social Psych</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>No Evidence to Support Psychological Debriefing in Schools</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/1/6/4421641.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/1/6/4421641.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 06:52:07 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>There is no evidence to support psychological debriefing in schools after traumatic events such as violence, suicides and accidental death, which runs counter to current practice in some Canadian school jurisdictions, according to a commentary &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmaj.ca/embargo/cmaj091621.pdf&quot;&gt;http://www.cmaj.ca/embargo/cmaj091621.pdf&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;CMAJ&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Canadian Medical Association Journal&lt;/span&gt;) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmaj.ca&quot;&gt;www.cmaj.ca&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Recent systematic reviews indicate that psychological debriefing of adults does not prevent post-traumatic stress disorder and it may even increase the risk of this disorder. While there is little research on the effectiveness and safety of these interventions in schools, &quot;the evidence clearly points to the ineffectiveness of these interventions in preventing post-traumatic stress disorder or any other psychiatric disorder in adults,&quot; write Magdalena Szumilas of the Sun Life Financial Chair in Adolescent Mental Health Team, Dalhousie University and coauthors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Two programs, based on the empirically-supported principles of engendering feelings of safety, calmness, sense of self and community efficacy, connectedness and hope, show promise of effectiveness. Providing Psychological First Aid immediately after an incident and providing cognitive behavioural support for students with persistent distress weeks after a school trauma has ended may be helpful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They urge that psychological debriefing not be performed after traumatic incidents in schools, and that more research is needed to assess psychological and mental health interventions prior to implementation in schools.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/PsychTherapies">Psych Therapies</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/StressandHealth">Stress and Health</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Can Kitchen Spoons be Dangerous Spoons?</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/1/5/4420805.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2010/1/5/4420805.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:08:43 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Cornell study shows we pour too little or too much medicine, depending on spoon size&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;A new study published in the Jan. 5 issue of the &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Annals of Internal Medicine&lt;/span&gt; illustrates the dangers of using kitchen spoons to measure liquid medicine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Former cold and flu sufferers were asked to pour one teaspoon of nighttime flu medicine into kitchen spoons of differing sizes. Depending upon the size of the spoon, the 195 former patients poured an average of eight percent too little or 12 percent too much medicine. &quot;When pouring into a medium-size tablespoon, participants under-dosed. But when using a larger spoon, they poured too much medicine,&quot; said Dr. Brian Wansink, Director of the Cornell Food and Brand Lab, who led the study.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Twelve percent more may not sound like a lot, but this goes on every four to eight hours, for up to four days,&quot; Wansink explained. &quot;So it really adds up—to the point of ineffectiveness or even danger.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Visual illusions and spatial relationships are familiar topics in Wansink&#39;s work in food and eating behavior. In his book &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Than We Think&lt;/span&gt;, he shows how smaller plates can unknowingly decrease how much people eat, and how taller glasses can decrease the amount of alcohol poured by even expert bartenders. &quot;Simply put, we cannot always trust our ability to estimate amounts,&quot; said the study&#39;s co-author, Dr. Koert van Ittersum, Assistant Professor of Marketing at Georgia Tech. &quot;In some cases it may not be important, but when it comes to the health of you or your child, it is vital to make an accurate measurement.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wansink and van Ittersum recommend using a proper device—a measuring cap or dropper, or dosing spoon or syringe—to measure liquid medicine.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Miscellany">Miscellany</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/SensationandPerception">Sensation and Perception</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Attention Demands May Explain Why Texting While Driving Is So Dangerous</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/12/22/4410059.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/12/22/4410059.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:55:36 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>A timely study in the journal &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Human Factors&lt;/span&gt; suggests why texting while driving is riskier than talking on a cell phone or with another passenger. Human factors/ergonomics researchers at the University of Utah found that texters in a driving simulator had more crashes, responded more slowly to brake lights on cars in front of them, and showed impairment in forward and lateral control than did drivers who talked on a cell phone while driving or drove without texting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Researchers Frank Drews and colleagues found evidence that attention patterns differ for drivers who text versus those who converse on a cell phone. In the latter case, the researchers say, &quot;drivers apparently attempt to divide attention between a phone conversation and driving, adjusting the processing priority of the two activities depending on task demands.&quot; But texting requires drivers to switch their attention from one task to the other. When such attention-switching occurs as drivers compose, read, or receive a text, their overall reaction times are substantially slower than when they&#39;re engaged in a phone conversation. The type of texting activity also appears to make a difference; in this study, reading messages affected braking times more than did composing them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The hazards of texting while driving continue to receive broad national and international attention as accident rates attributed to this practice increase. As a result, a growing number of U.S. cities and states, as well as Canadian provinces, ban texting while operating a vehicle. Drews et al. noted that according to CTIA (www.ctia.org), more than 1 trillion text messages were sent in 2008 in the United States alone. To find why and how much drivers are impaired during texting, the researchers engaged 20 men and 20 women between the ages of 19 and 23 in both a single task (straight driving) and a dual task (driving and texting) in a high-fidelity simulator. The participants, experienced texters with an average of 4.75 years of driving experience, received and sent messages while the researchers observed their brake onset time, following distance, lane maintenance, and collisions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The crash risk attributable to texting is substantial. One possible explanation is that drivers who text tend to decrease their minimum following distance and also experience delayed reaction time. For example, in the Drews et al. study, drivers&#39; median reaction time increased by 30 percent when they were texting and 9 percent when they talked on the phone, compared with their performance in a driving-only condition.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/CognitivePsych">Cognitive Psych</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Study: Believers&#39; Inferences About God&#39;s Beliefs are Uniquely Egocentric</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/12/6/4398340.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/12/6/4398340.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 09:20:34 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>Religious people tend to use their own beliefs as a guide in thinking about what God believes, but are less constrained when reasoning about other people&#39;s beliefs, according to new study published in the Nov. 30 early edition of the &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nicholas Epley, professor of behavioral science at the University of Chicago&#39;s Booth School of Business, led the research, which included a series of survey and neuroimaging studies to examine the extent to which people&#39;s own beliefs guide their predictions about God&#39;s beliefs. The findings of Epley and his co-authors at Australia&#39;s Monash University and UChicago extend existing work in psychology showing that people are often egocentric when they infer other people&#39;s beliefs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The PNAS paper reports the results of seven separate studies. The first four include surveys of Boston rail commuters, UChicago undergraduate students and a nationally representative database of online respondents in the United States. In these surveys, participants reported their own belief about an issue, their estimated God&#39;s belief, along with a variety of others, including Microsoft founder Bill Gates, Major League Baseball&#39;s Barry Bonds, President George W. Bush, and an average American.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Two other studies directly manipulated people&#39;s own beliefs and found that inferences about God&#39;s beliefs tracked their own beliefs. Study participants were asked, for example, to write and deliver a speech that supported or opposed the death penalty in front of a video camera. Their beliefs were surveyed both before and after the speech.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The final study involved functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure the neural activity of test subjects as they reasoned about their own beliefs versus those of God or another person. The data demonstrated that reasoning about God&#39;s beliefs activated many of the same regions that become active when people reasoned about their own beliefs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The researchers noted that people often set their moral compasses according to what they presume to be God&#39;s standards. &quot;The central feature of a compass, however, is that it points north no matter what direction a person is facing,&quot; they conclude. &quot;This research suggests that, unlike an actual compass, inferences about God&#39;s beliefs may instead point people further in whatever direction they are already facing.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the research in no way denies the possibility that God&#39;s presumed beliefs also may provide guidance in situations where people are uncertain of their own beliefs, the co-authors noted.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Miscellany">Miscellany</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Study Shows That Adults Have Dreamlike Thoughts During Sleepwalking and Sleep Terrors Episodes</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/12/6/4398326.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/12/6/4398326.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:55:30 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>A study in the Dec.1 issue of the journal &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Sleep&lt;/span&gt; shows that short, unpleasant, dreamlike mental activity occurs during sleepwalking and sleep terrors episodes, suggesting that people with these sleep disorders may be acting out dreamlike thoughts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Results show that 71 percent of participants reported at least one incident of dreamlike mental content associated with an episode of sleepwalking or sleep terrors, and the action in the dreamlike thoughts corresponded with the observed behavior. A total of 106 reports of dreamlike mental activity were collected; the mental content was brief, with 95 percent of the reports involving a single visual scene. These dreamlike thoughts were frequently unpleasant, with 84 percent involving apprehension, fear or terror; 54 percent involving misfortune, in which injury, mishap or adversity occurred through chance or environmental circumstances; and 24 percent involving aggression, with the dreamer always being the victim. Compared with healthy controls, patients with sleepwalking and sleep terrors reported more severe daytime sleepiness and had four times as many arousals from slow-wave sleep.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Principal investigator Isabelle Arnulf, MD, PhD, neurologist and head of the sleep disorders unit at Unité des Pathologies du Sommeil at Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière in Paris, France, said that it has been widely believed that dreams do not occur during sleepwalking and sleep terrors events. However, previous studies focused mostly on children rather than adults.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;The results are surprising, as it is commonly reported that sleepwalkers and patients with sleep terrors do not remember dreaming,&quot; said Arnulf. &quot;Adults involved in the study who experienced sleepwalking and sleep terrors were less confused during the episode than children, making it easier to express their dream mentations.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to the AASM, sleepwalking and sleep terrors typically occur during arousals from slow-wave sleep and are classified as &quot;parasomnias,&quot; which are undesirable events or experiences that occur during entry into sleep, within sleep or during arousals from sleep. Sleepwalking occurs when a person gets out of bed and walks around with an altered state of consciousness and impaired judgment. An episode of sleep terrors occurs when a person sits up in bed with a look of intense fear, often making a cry or piercing scream.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Forty-three patients with severe, frequent, dangerous or disturbing episodes of sleepwalking or sleep terrors participated in the study and were matched with 25 healthy control subjects. The mean age of patients was 26 years with a range from 11 to 72 years, and 46 percent were male. Five patients suffered exclusively from sleep terrors, eight subjects suffered from sleepwalking only and 30 experienced both sleepwalking and sleep terrors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Data were gathered retrospectively by interview, so that the dreamlike thoughts that were collected covered a lifetime span for each patient. Thirty-eight patients (88 percent) were able to reliably answer questions about their mental content during the sleepwalking and sleep terrors episodes. Sleep also was monitored during one night in a laboratory.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For a long time rapid eye movement (REM) sleep has been considered to be the neurobiological basis of dreaming, the authors noted. Although complex mental activity has been reported in non-REM sleep during slow-wave sleep, the extent to which the reported dreamlike thoughts may be described as &quot;dreaming&quot; is still debated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The authors suggested that the brief, dreamlike activity occurring during sleepwalking and sleep terrors could be either the terminal part of a longer dream that is forgotten at the time of arousal, or a short mental creation elicited before or just at the time of arousal.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/ConsciousnessSleep">Consciousness &amp; Sleep</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>When Preschoolers Ask Questions, They Want Explanations</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/11/24/4388968.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/11/24/4388968.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:58:07 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>Curiosity plays a big part in preschoolers&#39; lives. A new study that explored why young children ask so many &quot;why&quot; questions concludes that children are motivated by a desire for explanation. The study, by researchers at the University of Michigan, appears in the November/December 2009 issue of the journal &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Child Development&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The researchers carried out two studies of 2- to 5-year-olds, focusing on their &quot;how&quot; and &quot;why&quot; questions, as well as their requests for explanatory information, and looking carefully at the children&#39;s reactions to the answers they received from adults. In the first study, the researchers examined longitudinal transcripts of six children&#39;s everyday conversations with parents, siblings, and visitors at home from ages 2 to 4. In the second study, they looked at the laboratory-based conversations of 42 preschoolers, using toys, storybooks, and videos to prompt the children, ages 3 to 5, to ask questions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By looking at how the children reacted to the answers they received to their questions, the researchers found that children seem to be more satisfied when they receive an explanatory answer than when they do not. In both studies, when preschoolers got an explanation, they seemed satisfied (they agreed or asked a new follow-up question). But when they got answers that weren&#39;t explanations, they seemed dissatisfied and were more likely to repeat their original question or provide an alternative explanation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Examining conversational exchanges, and in particular children&#39;s reactions to the different types of information they get from adults in response to their own requests, confirms that young children are motivated to actively seek explanations,&quot; according to the researchers. &quot;They use specific conversational strategies to obtain that information. When preschoolers ask &#39;why&#39; questions, they&#39;re not merely trying to prolong conversation, they&#39;re trying to get to the bottom of things.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The moderate sample size means that the study cannot be generalized to all children, but the research clearly suggests that by age 2, children contribute actively to the process of learning about the world around them.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Development">Development</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Transcendental Meditation Helped Heart Disease Patients Lower Cardiac Disease Risks by 50 Percent</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/11/18/4384163.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/11/18/4384163.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:49:14 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>Patients with coronary heart disease who practiced the stress-reducing Transcendental Meditation® technique had nearly 50 percent lower rates of heart attack, stroke, and death compared to nonmeditating controls, according to the results of a first-ever study presented during the annual meeting of the American Heart Association in Orlando, Fla., on 16 Nov. 2009.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The trial was sponsored by a $3.8 million grant from the National Institutes of Health–National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and was conducted at The Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee in collaboration with the Institute for Natural Medicine and Prevention at Maharishi University of Management in Fairfield, Iowa.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The nine-year, randomized control trial followed 201 African American men and women, average age 59 years, with narrowing of arteries in their hearts who were randomly assigned to either practice the stress-reducing Transcendental Meditation technique or to participate in a control group which received health education classes in traditional risk factors, including dietary modification and exercise. All participants continued standard medications and other usual medical care.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The study found:&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;A 47% reduction in the combination of death, heart attacks, and strokes in the participants&lt;br&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Clinically significant (5 mm Hg average) reduction in blood pressure associated with decrease in clinical events&lt;br&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Significant reductions in psychological stress in the high-stress subgroup&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;According to Robert Schneider, M.D., FACC, lead author and director of the Center for Natural Medicine and Prevention, &quot;Previous research on Transcendental Meditation has shown reductions in blood pressure, psychological stress, and other risk factors for heart disease, irrespective of ethnicity. But this is the first controlled clinical trial to show that long-term practice of this particular stress reduction program reduces the incidence of clinical cardiovascular events, that is heart attacks, strokes and mortality.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;This study is an example of the contribution of a lifestyle intervention—stress management—to the prevention of cardiovascular disease in high-risk patients,&quot; said Theodore Kotchen, M.D., co-author of the study, professor of medicine, and associate dean for clinical research at the Medical College. Other investigators at the Milwaukee site included Drs. Jane Kotchen and Clarence Grim.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dr. Schneider said that the effect of Transcendental Meditation in the trial was like adding a class of newly discovered medications for the prevention of heart disease. &quot;In this case, the new medications are derived from the body&#39;s own internal pharmacy stimulated by the Transcendental Meditation practice,&quot; he said.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/StressandHealth">Stress and Health</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Teens and Distracted Driving</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/11/16/4382346.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/11/16/4382346.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:50:37 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Texting, Talking and Other Uses of the Cell Phone Behind the Wheel&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;(by Mary Madden, Senior Research Specialist and Amanda Lenhart, Senior Research Specialist, Pew Internet &amp;amp; American Life Project)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Overview of Study:&lt;/span&gt; Over the summer of 2009, the Pew Research Center&#39;s Internet &amp;amp; American Life Project conducted a survey of 800 teens ages 12-17 asking about their experiences with cell phone use in cars. All of the teens in our survey were asked about their experiences as passengers, and if they were age 16 or older and have a cell phone, they were also asked about their own actions behind the wheel including both talking and text messaging. Additionally, the Pew Internet Project and the University of Michigan conducted nine focus groups with teens ages 12-18 between June and October 2009 where the topic of driving and mobile phones was addressed. The following are the major findings from the survey and focus groups: &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;75% of all American teens ages 12-17 own a cell phone, and 66% use their phones to send or receive text messages.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Older teens are more likely than younger teens to have cell phones and use text messaging; 82% of teens ages 16-17 have a cell phone and 76% of that cohort are cell phone texters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;One in three (34%) texting teens ages 16-17 say they have texted while driving. That translates into 26% of all American teens ages 16-17.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Half (52%) of cell-owning teens ages 16-17 say they have talked on a cell phone while driving. That translates into 43% of all American teens ages 16-17.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;48% of all teens ages 12-17 say they have been in a car when the driver was texting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;40% say they have been in a car when the driver used a cell phone in a way that put themselves or others in danger.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br&gt;[full report available &lt;a href=&quot;http://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/teens-and-distracted-driving.pdf&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; (.pdf)]&lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/CognitivePsych">Cognitive Psych</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>First Ever Large-Scale Study of Ketamine Users Published</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/11/16/4382339.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/11/16/4382339.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:38:30 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>The first ever large-scale, longitudinal study of ketamine users has been published online today in the journal &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Addiction&lt;/span&gt;. With Ketamine (K, Special K) use increasing faster than any other drug in the UK (British Crime Survey, 2008) this research showing the consequences of repeated ketamine use provides valuable information for users and addiction professionals alike.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the study, researchers from University College London followed 150 people over a year to see if changes in their ketamine use could predict changes in their psychological well-being, memory and concentration. Of these 150 people, 30 were taking large quantities of the drug nearly every day, 30 were taking it &#39;recreationally&#39; (once or twice a month), 30 were former users, 30 used illicit drugs apart from ketamine and 30 did not use any illicit drugs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The authors found that the heavy ketamine users were impaired on several measures, including verbal memory. Short term memory and visual memory in this group decreased over the year as ketamine use increased. These individuals also performed more poorly overall on verbal memory, displaying symptoms such as forgetfulness and experiencing difficulty recalling conversations and people&#39;s names.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The amount of increase in ketamine use over the course of one year was also a source of concern. Hair analysis showed that ketamine levels among recreational users doubled at follow-up compared to initial testing, a pattern seen with other addictive drugs. Ketamine levels in the frequent using group did not change across the year, but this group was already using up to ten grams per day at initial testing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interestingly, the recreational ketamine users and ex-ketamine users did not differ from non-drug-taking controls on memory, attention and measures of psychological well-being, suggesting that occasional ketamine use does not lead to prolonged harms to cognitive function and that any damage may be reversed when people quit using the drug. However, all groups of ketamine users showed evidence of unusual beliefs or mild &#39;delusions&#39;, with these being greatest in the frequent users and least in ex-users (i.e. it appeared dependent on the amount of the drug used). It is not clear to what extent this is a pre-existing difference in ketamine users, something that develops from using the drug or a mixture of both.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Says lead author Dr. Celia Morgan: &quot;These findings have implications for the growing number of ketamine users in the UK as well as addiction professionals who may encounter increasing numbers of ketamine dependent users. These findings suggest these frequent ketamine users will be impaired, albeit transiently, in a variety of psychological domains.&quot;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Miscellany">Miscellany</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Walking Hazard: Cell-phone Use -- But Not Music -- Reduces Pedestrian Safety</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/11/16/4382327.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/11/16/4382327.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:18:37 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>Two new studies of pedestrian safety found that using a cell phone while hoofing it can endanger one&#39;s health. Older pedestrians, in particular, are impaired when crossing a busy (simulated) street while speaking on a mobile phone, the researchers found.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The studies, in which participants crossed a virtual street while talking on the phone or listening to music, found that the music-listeners were able to navigate traffic as well as the average unencumbered pedestrian. Users of hands-free cell phones, however, took longer to cross the same street under the same conditions and were more likely to get run over.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Older cell-phone users, especially those unsteady on their feet to begin with, were even more likely to become traffic casualties. &quot;Many people assume that walking is so automatic that really nothing will get in the way,&quot; said University of Illinois psychology professor Art Kramer, who led the research with psychology professor Jason McCarley and postdoctoral researcher Mark Neider. &quot;And walking is pretty automatic, but actually walking in environments that have lots of obstacles is perhaps not as automatic as one might think.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The first study, in the journal &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Accident Analysis and Prevention&lt;/span&gt;, found that college-age adults who were talking on a cell phone took 25 percent longer to cross the street than their peers who were not on the phone. They were also more likely to fail to cross the street in the 30 seconds allotted for the task, even though their peers were able to do so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Each participant walked on a manual treadmill in a virtual environment, meaning that each encountered the exact same conditions – the same number and speed of cars, for example – as their peers. The second (and not yet published) study gave adults age 60 and above the same tasks, and included some participants who had a history of falling. The differences between those on and off the phone were even more striking in the older group, Kramer said. &quot;Older adults on the phone got run over about 15 percent more often&quot; than those not on the phone, he said, and those with a history of falling fared even worse. &quot;So walking and talking on the phone while old, especially, appears to be dangerous,&quot; he said.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/CognitivePsych">Cognitive Psych</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Right-handed Chimpanzees Provide Clues to the Origin of Human Language</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/11/16/4382324.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/11/16/4382324.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:14:22 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>Most of the linguistic functions in humans are controlled by the left cerebral hemisphere. A study of captive chimpanzees at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center (Atlanta, Georgia), reported in the January 2010 issue of Elsevier&#39;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.elsevier.com/locate/cortex&quot;&gt;Cortex&lt;/a&gt;, suggests that this &quot;hemispheric lateralization&quot; for language may have its evolutionary roots in the gestural communication of our common ancestors. A large majority of the chimpanzees in the study showed a significant bias towards right-handed gestures when communicating, which may reflect a similar dominance of the left hemisphere for communication in chimpanzees as that seen for language functions in humans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A team of researchers, supervised by Prof. William D. Hopkins of Agnes Scott College (Decatur, Georgia), studied hand-use in 70 captive chimpanzees over a period of 10 months, recording a variety of communicative gestures specific to chimpanzees. These included &#39;arm threat&#39;, &#39;extend arm&#39; or &#39;hand-slap&#39; gestures produced in different social contexts, such as attention-getting interactions, shared excitation, threat, aggression, greeting, reconciliation or invitations for grooming or for play. The gestures were directed at the human observers, as well as toward other chimpanzees.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;The degree of predominance of the right hand for gestures is one of the most pronounced we have ever found in chimpanzees in comparison to other non-communicative manual actions. We already found such manual biases in this species for pointing gestures exclusively directed to humans. These additional data clearly showed that right-handedness for gestures is not specifically associated to interactions with humans, but generalizes to intraspecific communication&quot;, notes Prof. Hopkins.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The French co-authors, Dr. Adrien Meguerditchian and Prof. Jacques Vauclair, from the Aix-Marseille University (Aix-en-Provence, France), also point out that &quot;this finding provides additional support to the idea that speech evolved initially from a gestural communicative system in our ancestors. Moreover, gestural communication in apes shares some key features with human language, such as intentionality, referential properties and flexibility of learning and use&quot;.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Ethology">Ethology</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/LanguageandThought">Language and Thought</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Use of Cannabinoids Could Help Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Patients</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/11/14/4380231.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/11/14/4380231.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:48:08 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;&#39;The results of our research should encourage psychiatric investigation into using cannabinoids in post-traumatic stress patients,&#39; says researcher Dr. Irit Akirav of the University of Haifa&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Use of cannabinoids (marijuana) could assist in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder patients. This is exposed in a recent study carried out at the Learning and Memory Lab in the University of Haifa&#39;s Department of Psychology. The study, carried out by research student Eti Ganon-Elazar under the supervision of Dr. Irit Akirav, was published in the prestigious &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Journal of Neuroscience&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In most cases, the result of experiencing a traumatic event – a car accident or terror attack – is the appearance of medical and psychological symptoms that affect various functions, but which pass. However, some 10%-30% of people who experience a traumatic event develop post-traumatic stress disorder, a condition in which the patient continues to suffer stress symptoms for months and even years after the traumatic event. Symptoms include reawakened trauma, avoidance of anything that could recall the trauma, and psychological and physiological disturbances. One of the problems in the course of treating trauma patients is that a person is frequently exposed to additional stress, which hinders the patient&#39;s overcoming the trauma.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The present study, carried out by Dr. Akirav and research student Eti Ganon-Elazar, aimed to examine the efficiency of cannabinoids as a medical treatment for coping with post-traumatic stress. The researchers used a synthetic form of marijuana, which has similar properties to the natural plant, and they chose to use a rat model, which presents similar physiological responses to stress to that of humans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The first stage of the research examined how long it took for the rats to overcome a traumatic experience, without any intervention. A cell colored white on one side and black on the other was prepared. The rats were placed in the white area, and as soon as they moved over to the black area, which they prefer, they received a light electric shock. Each day they were brought to the cell and placed back in the white area. Immediately following exposure to the traumatic experience, the rats would not move to the black area voluntarily, but a few days later after not receiving further electric shocks in the black area, they learned that it is safe again and moved there without hesitation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Next, the researchers introduced an element of stress. A second group of rats were placed on a small, elevated platform after receiving the electric shock, which added stress to the traumatic experience. These rats abstained from returning to the black area in the cell for much longer, which shows that the exposure to additional stress does indeed hinder the process of overcoming trauma.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The third stage of the research examined yet another group of rats. These were exposed to the traumatic and additional stress events, but just before being elevated on the platform received an injection of synthetic marijuana in the amygdala area of the brain – a specific area known to be connected to emotive memory. These rats agreed to enter the black area after the same amount of time as the first group – showing that the synthetic marijuana cancelled out the symptoms of stress. Refining the results of this study, the researchers then administered marijuana injections at different points in time on additional groups of rats, and found that regardless of when exactly the injection was administered, it prevented the surfacing of stress symptoms.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dr. Akirav and Ganon-Elazar also examined hormonal changes in the course of the experiment and found that synthetic marijuana prevents increased release of the stress hormone that the body produces in response to stress.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to Dr. Akirav, the results of this study show that cannabinoids can play an important role in stress-related disorders. &quot;The results of our research should encourage psychiatric investigation into the use of cannabinoids in post-traumatic stress patients,&quot; she concludes.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/PsychDisorders">Psych Disorders</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/StressandHealth">Stress and Health</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>New Evidence That Dark Chocolate Helps Ease Emotional Stress</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/11/13/4379775.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/11/13/4379775.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:55:57 -0600</pubDate>
    <description>The &quot;chocolate cure&quot; for emotional stress is getting new support from a clinical trial published online in ACS&#39; &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Journal of Proteome Research&lt;/span&gt;. It found that eating about an ounce and a half of dark chocolate a day for two weeks reduced levels of stress hormones in the bodies of people feeling highly stressed. Everyone&#39;s favorite treat also partially corrected other stress-related biochemical imbalances.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sunil Kochhar and colleagues note growing scientific evidence that antioxidants and other beneficial substances in dark chocolate may reduce risk factors for heart disease and other physical conditions. Studies also suggest that chocolate may ease emotional stress. Until now, however, there was little evidence from research in humans on exactly how chocolate might have those stress-busting effects.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the study, scientists identified reductions in stress hormones and other stress-related biochemical changes in volunteers who rated themselves as highly stressed and ate dark chocolate for two weeks. &quot;The study provides strong evidence that a daily consumption of 40 grams [1.4 ounces] during a period of 2 weeks is sufficient to modify the metabolism of healthy human volunteers,&quot; the scientists say.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See also: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2008/9/26/3901742.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Dark Chocolate: Half a Bar Per Week to Keep at Bay the Risk of Heart Attack&lt;/a&gt; posted in Sept 2008&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;DOWNLOAD FULL TEXT ARTICLE&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://pubs.acs.org/stoken/presspac/presspac/full/10.1021/pr900607v&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://pubs.acs.org/stoken/presspac/presspac/full/10.1021/pr900607v&lt;/a&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Miscellany">Miscellany</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/StressandHealth">Stress and Health</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Bosses Who Feel Inadequate are More Likely to Bully</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/10/14/4350916.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/10/14/4350916.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:08:06 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>Bosses who are in over their heads are more likely to bully subordinates. That&#39;s because feelings of inadequacy trigger them to lash out at those around them, according to new research from the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of Southern California. In a new twist on the adage &quot;power corrupts,&quot; researchers at UC Berkeley and USC have found a direct link among supervisors and upper management between self-perceived incompetence and aggression. The findings, gleaned from four separate studies, are published in the November issue of the journal &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Psychological Science&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With more than one-third of American workers reporting that their bosses have sabotaged, yelled at or belittled them, the new study challenges previous assumptions that abusive bosses are solely driven by ambition and the need to hold onto their power. &quot;By showing when and why power leads to aggression, these findings are highly relevant as abusive supervision is such a pervasive problem in society,&quot; said Nathanael Fast, assistant professor of management and organization at USC and lead author of the study.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;During role-playing sessions, study participants who felt their egos were under threat would go so far as to needlessly sabotage an underling&#39;s chances of winning money. In another test, participants who felt inadequate would request that a subordinate who gave a wrong answer to a test be notified by a loud obnoxious horn, even though they had the option of choosing silence or a quiet sound.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Researchers did not rate participants by an objective measure of competency, but by their self-reported level of competency. This allowed them to investigate how feelings of self-worth are tied to workplace behavior. &quot;Incompetence alone doesn&#39;t lead to aggression,&quot; said Serena Chen, associate professor of psychology at UC Berkeley and co-author of the study. &quot;It&#39;s the combination of having a high-power role and fearing that one is not up to the task that causes power holders to lash out. And our data suggest it&#39;s ultimately about self-worth.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Alternately, Chen said, participants who got ego boosts by scoring high in a leadership aptitude test or who recalled an incident or principle that made them feel good about themselves did not react with aggression. That said, flattery may not be the best way to soothe a savage boss, the study points out: &quot;It is both interesting and ironic to note that such flattery, although perhaps affirming to the ego, may contribute to the incompetent power holder&#39;s ultimate demise — by causing the power holder to lose touch with reality,&quot; the study concludes.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Miscellany">Miscellany</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>What the Experts Still Don&#39;t Know</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/10/9/4346235.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/10/9/4346235.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:43:48 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=what-the-experts-still-dont-know-09-10-06&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;What the Experts Still Don&#39;t Know&lt;/a&gt; (podcast)&lt;br&gt;



&lt;span&gt;This month the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bps.org.uk/index.cfm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;British Psychological Society&lt;/a&gt; published the 150th issue of its &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Research Digest&lt;/span&gt;. To celebrate, they asked 23 world-renowned psychologists the following question: What is one nagging thing that you still don’t understand about yourself? (&lt;a href=&quot;http://bps-research-digest.blogspot.com/2009/10/one-nagging-thing-you-still-dont_05.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;full article&lt;/a&gt;) A few touched on consciousness. But many wrote about the conundrum of how understanding behavior does nothing to change behavior.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot; href=&quot;http://www.sciam.com/podcast/podcasts.cfm?type=60-second-psych&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;60-Second Psych&lt;/a&gt; from Scientific American podcasts&lt;br&gt;9 November 2009</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Miscellany">Miscellany</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Podcasts">Podcasts</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>New Study Finds High Rates of Childhood Exposure to Violence and Abuse in US</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/10/9/4346231.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/10/9/4346231.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:33:45 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>A new study from the University of New Hampshire finds that U.S. children are routinely exposed to even more violence and abuse than has been previously recognized, with nearly half experiencing a physical assault in the study year. &quot;Children experience far more violence, abuse and crime than do adults,&quot; said David Finkelhor, director of the UNH &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Crimes against Children Research Center&lt;/a&gt; and the study director. &quot;If life were this dangerous for ordinary grown-ups, we&#39;d never tolerate it.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The research was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) and supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The research results are presented in the journal Pediatrics and an Office of Justice Programs/OJJDP bulletin titled &quot;Children&#39;s Exposure to Violence: A Comprehensive National Survey.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;UNH researchers asked a national sample of U.S. children and their caregivers about a far broader range of exposures than has been done in the past. According to the research, three out of five children were exposed to violence, abuse or a criminal victimization in the last year, including 46 percent who had been physically assaulted, 10 percent who had been maltreated by a caregiver, 6 percent who had been sexually victimized, and 10 percent who had witnessed an assault within their family.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The authors contend that earlier studies of violence exposure only inquired about individual crimes – looking only at bullying or child maltreatment or sexual abuse. In contrast, this study asked about all such exposures as well as additional ones that are rarely, if ever, covered such as dating violence and witnessing domestic violence.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The study found that more than a third of the children had had two or more different kinds of exposures in the past year and 11 percent had five or more. &quot;Studies have missed the fact that there are a surprisingly large group of very repeatedly and variously victimized kids whom we should be doing a better job to help and protect,&quot; Finkelhor said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The researchers urge teachers, police, doctors, counselors, and parents to ask children about a broader range of possible victimization experiences, especially children who had been identified as victims already. They also call for new efforts to create safer schools, homes and other youth environments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The study was conducted in 2008 and involved interviews with caregivers and youth about the experiences of a nationally representative sample of 4,549 children ages 0-17. In addition to Finkelhor, the authors include Heather Turner, professor of sociology at UNH, Richard Ormrod, research professor of geography at UNH, and Sherry Hamby, research associate professor of psychology at Sewanee, the University of the South. &lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Development">Development</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Miscellany">Miscellany</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Girls&#39; Violence on the Rise (Australian research)</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/9/24/4331503.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/9/24/4331503.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:22:04 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>The link between cyber-bullying and an increase in violence among young women will be featured in a new book, &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Offending Youth: Sex, Youth and Crime&lt;/span&gt;, published in November. Professor Kerry Carrington, head of Queensland University of Technology&#39;s School of Justice, has collected 45 years of data and can confirm, contrary to general academic opinion, young women are fast catching up to boys in violent crime.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Professor Carrington will present her findings at a talk on Thursday, September 24 in Brisbane. At that time, Professor Carrington will discuss whether increases in cyber-bullying are related to increases in female delinquency and boys&#39; continuing monopoly over sexually violent crimes. The book also includes chapters on the over-representation of Indigenous youth in the juvenile justice system, dispelling unfounded myths and fears about ethnic youth gangs, and key contemporary patterns of delinquency and the response to these by juvenile justice agencies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Professor Carrington said her data backed up anecdotal reports that violence among girls was increasing. &quot;There&#39;s been a long dispute whether it was happening, but this data shows a pattern of statistics that point to a clear trend,&quot; Professor Carrington said. &quot;And it is not just in Australia, but across Europe, the UK and US as well.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Professor Carrington said there were different theories about why this was the case, including treating girls&#39; crime equally with boys&#39; crime and increasing female participation in what used to be traditional masculine roles, but these did not adequately explain the recent sharp increase. &quot;Increases in violence began when girls began moving into drug and street cultures in the 1980s, but the most significant increases in violence was in the past decade,&quot; she said. &quot;Girls are taking to cyber space, e-technology and mobile phones with a passion and evidence shows girls are more likely to use these to bully. These technologies massively inflame conflict between girls. Increasingly, girls are bashing other girls, and videos of these are being put onto YouTube. Bullying used to end at the end of school, but now it follows you home and can escalate over night.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Professor Carrington said a long-standing reluctance to accept increasing violence between girls meant there were few specific programs to address it. &quot;The majority of rehabilitation programs focus on boys&#39; delinquencies which may not be as effective in dealing with violent girls,&quot; she said. Professor Carrington said from 1960 to 2007, the ratio of young women to young men appearing before the NSW Children&#39;s Courts for criminal matters has narrowed from 1 in 14 to1 in 5, and girls continued to narrow the gap in violent crime. &quot;Boys&#39; crime rates are falling in overall terms, but within that, rates of sexual violence are of an increasing concern,&quot; she said. Girls&#39; crime rates are increasing overall and girls&#39; violence, usually directed towards other girls, is increasing.&quot;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/SocialPsych">Social Psych</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Lies My Parents Told Me</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/9/24/4331493.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/9/24/4331493.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:15:52 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;New study shows parents use deception to influence their children&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Parents say that honesty is the best policy, but they regularly lie to their children as a way of influencing their behavior and emotions, finds new research from the University of Toronto and the University of California, San Diego.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Surprisingly little scholarship has been published on the subject of parental lying, so Gail Heyman, professor of psychology at UC San Diego, Diem Luu, a former UCSD student, and Kang Lee, professor at the University of Toronto and director of the Institute of Child Study at OISE, set out to explore the under-researched phenomenon. They asked U.S. participants in two related studies about parents lying to their children – either for the purpose of promoting appropriate behavior or to make them happy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In one of the studies, many parents reported they told their young children that bad things would happen if they didn&#39;t go to bed or eat what they were supposed to. For example, one mother said she told her child that if he didn&#39;t finish all of his food he would get pimples all over his face. Other parents reported inventing magical creatures. One explained, &quot;We told our daughter that if she wrapped up all her pacifiers like gifts, the &#39;paci-fairy&#39; would come and give them to children who needed them...I thought it was healthier to get rid of the pacifiers, and it was a way for her to feel proud and special.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the other study, the researchers surveyed college students&#39; recollections about their parents&#39; lying and obtained similar results: parents often lie to their children even as they tell them that lying is unacceptable. The researchers refer to this practice as &quot;parenting by lying.&quot; &quot;We are surprised by how often parenting by lying takes place,&quot; said Lee. &quot;Moreover, our findings showed that even the parents who most strongly promoted the importance of honesty with their children engaged in parenting by lying.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Though Heyman thinks that there are occasions when it is appropriate to be less than truthful with a child – &quot;telling a two-year-old you don&#39;t like their drawing is just cruel,&quot; she said – she urges parents to think through the issues and consider alternatives before resorting to the expedient lie. &quot;Children sometimes behave in ways that are disruptive or are likely to harm their long-term interests,&quot; said Heyman. &quot;It is common for parents to try out a range of strategies, including lying, to gain compliance. When parents are juggling the demands of getting through the day, concerns about possible long-term negative consequences to children&#39;s beliefs about honesty are not necessarily at the forefront.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The research also examined &quot;parenting by lying&quot; among Asian-American and European-American parents. Asian-American parents were more likely to report lying to their children for the purpose of influencing their behavior. According to the researchers, one possible explanation for this finding is that as compared to European-American parents, Asian-American parents tend to place a greater emphasis on the importance of teaching children to be respectful and obedient, and they use a range of parenting strategies to meet these ends.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The research is published in the current edition of the &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Journal of Moral Education &lt;/span&gt;and was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Heyman and Lee are now preparing an international study to explore the subject further, and they are also beginning to study the possible consequences of &quot;parenting by lying&quot;: Does it create confusion about right and wrong? Does it undermine a child&#39;s trust? &lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Development">Development</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Use It or Lose It? Study Suggests the Brain Can Remember a &#39;Forgotten&#39; Language</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/9/24/4331486.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/9/24/4331486.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:05:12 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>Many of us learn a foreign language when we are young, but in some cases, exposure to that language is brief and we never get to hear or practice it subsequently. Our subjective impression is often that the neglected language completely fades away from our memory. But does &quot;use it or lose it&quot; apply to foreign languages? Although it may seem we have absolutely no memory of the neglected language, new research suggests this &quot;forgotten&quot; language may be more deeply engraved in our minds than we realize.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Psychologists Jeffrey Bowers, Sven L. Mattys, and Suzanne Gage from the University of Bristol recruited volunteers who were native English speakers but who had learned either Hindi or Zulu as children when living abroad. The researchers focused on Hindi and Zulu because these languages contain certain phonemes that are difficult for native English speakers to recognize. A phoneme is the smallest sound in a language—a group of phonemes forms a word.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The scientists asked the volunteers to complete a background vocabulary test to see if they remembered any words from the neglected language. They then trained the participants to distinguish between pairs of phonemes that started Hindi or Zulu words.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As it turned out, even though the volunteers showed no memory of the second language in the vocabulary test, they were able to quickly relearn and correctly identify phonemes that were spoken in the neglected language.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These findings, which appeared in a recent issue of &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Psychological Science&lt;/span&gt;, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, suggest that exposing young children to foreign languages, even if they do not continue to speak them, can have a lasting impact on speech perception. The authors conclude, &quot;Even if the language is forgotten (or feels this way) after many years of disuse, leftover traces of the early exposure can manifest themselves as an improved ability to relearn the language.&quot;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/LanguageandThought">Language and Thought</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Learning">Learning</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Rough Day at Work? You Won&#39;t Feel Like Exercising</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/9/24/4331482.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/9/24/4331482.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:02:45 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;We can challenge our brains or our bodies, but not both, says study&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have you ever sat down to work on a crossword puzzle only to find that afterwards you haven&#39;t the energy to exercise? Or have you come home from a rough day at the office with no energy to go for a run?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A new study, published today in &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Psychology and Health&lt;/span&gt;, reveals that if you use your willpower to do one task, it depletes you of the willpower to do an entirely different task. &quot;Cognitive tasks, as well as emotional tasks such as regulating your emotions, can deplete your self-regulatory capacity to exercise,&quot; says Kathleen Martin Ginis, associate professor of kinesiology at McMaster University, and lead author of the study.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Martin Ginis and her colleague Steven Bray used a Stroop test to deplete the self-regulatory capacity of volunteers in the study. (A Stroop test consists of words associated with colors but printed in a different color. For example, &quot;red&quot; is printed in blue ink.) Subjects were asked to say the color on the screen, trying to resist the temptation to blurt out the printed word instead of the color itself. &quot;After we used this cognitive task to deplete participants&#39; self-regulatory capacity, they didn&#39;t exercise as hard as participants who had not performed the task. The more people &quot;dogged it&quot; after the cognitive task, the more likely they were to skip their exercise sessions over the next 8 weeks. &quot;You only have so much willpower.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still, she doesn&#39;t see that as an excuse to let people loaf on the sofa. &quot;There are strategies to help people rejuvenate after their self-regulation is depleted,&quot; she says. &quot;Listening to music can help; and we also found that if you make specific plans to exercise—in other words, making a commitment to go for a walk at 7 p.m. every evening—then that had a high rate of success.&quot; She says that by constantly challenging yourself to resist a piece of chocolate cake, or to force yourself to study an extra half-hour each night, then you can actually increase your self-regulatory capacity. &quot;Willpower is like a muscle: it needs to be challenged to build itself,&quot; she says.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/StressandHealth">Stress and Health</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Poor Work Ethic in College Predicts Burnout 17 Years Later</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/9/23/4329955.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/9/23/4329955.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:08:38 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Abstract&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;To examine whether individuals’ achievement strategies measured during university studies would have an impact on work burnout and work engagement measured 10, 14 and 17 years later, 292 university students completed the SAQ strategy questionnaire three times while at university, and the work burnout inventory three times and work engagement inventory twice during their early career. The results showed that optimism increased during university, while task-avoidance did not change. Moreover, high and increasing optimism during university predicted a high level of work engagement and low level of burnout 10, 14 and 17 years later. By contrast, a high level of task-avoidance during university predicted a low level of work engagement and high level of burnout during the early career.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Salmela-Aro, K., Tolvanen, A., &amp;amp; Nurmi, J. (2009). Achievement strategies during university studies predict early career burnout and engagement. &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Journal of Vocational Behavior&lt;/span&gt;, 75 (2), 162-172.&lt;br&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.03.009&quot; target=&quot;_blank&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;Article summary on Science Direct&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;br&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Miscellany">Miscellany</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Dr. A</dc:creator>
    <title>Jung&#39;s &quot;Red Book&quot; to be Published Soon</title>
    <link>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/9/21/4328643.html</link>
    <guid>http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/_archives/2009/9/21/4328643.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:01:57 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/20/magazine/20jung-t.html?_r=1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The Holy Grail of the Unconscious&lt;/a&gt; — New York Times article (login required) about the publication of Jung&#39;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.wwnorton.com/books/detail.aspx?ID=12004&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Red Book&lt;/a&gt; (link to publisher&#39;s page) due out in October 2009.</description>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/ConsciousnessSleep">Consciousness &amp; Sleep</category>
    
    <category domain="http://blog.psych.andress.com/blog/Miscellany">Miscellany</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
</channel>
</rss>
